Shady

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 176 through 200 (of 804 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Should Mo shop both Walker and Gorman at the deadline?

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #259051
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM, Contreras is certainly more formidable than Goldy and Arenado, right now. Burleson is the most solid hitter on the team. right now. I have many astute Cardinals friends/fans that rave about him. Actually, touting him as the team MVP. But, I know, you have higher standards. lol

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #259041
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Burleson is a “stud, bud” player. He can fricken’ hit. Be thankful he’s a Cardinal. I took tons of grief for supporting him earlier. No biggie. I just saw it in Burleson. The Cardinals now need some high-priced “big boys” to perform like Burly has recenly.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #259027
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM, are you really sure Contreras is ” the team’s best hitter by a wide margin”? Some now feel Burleson is, at least, the Cardinals’ “most feared hitter”, right now. That has to befuddle you, somewhat. lol Give it up, man. You were grossly wrong in your nasty posts regarding Burleson and my support of him in the past.

    in reply to: GORMAN #259022
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Do Cardinals fans truly appreciate the development and contribution of Winn, Burleson and Pages have made this season? Especially, since others, with high expectations, have not performed well. I’m very glad those quality players, Winn, Burleson and Pages, are with the Cardinals. Hopefully, for many years to come.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Pallente and Liberatore have certainly been bright spots, recently.

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258995
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    The Cardinals just need the “big money guys” (Contreras, Goldschmidt and Arenado) to produce like they are getting paid, plentifully, to do.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #258992
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    It’s obvious that Marmol really likes Winn and Burleson at 1 and 2. And it’s been a good combo at the top of the order. Now, the “big money guys” need to come through at 3, 4 and 5. Will they? that’s the multi-million dollars a year question looming.

    in reply to: GORMAN #258986
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    They way way both Arenado and Gorman have been struggling recently. Mo picking up both Saggese and Prieto might turn out to be very good insurance for the infield.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    ZTR, I agree. Both Kittridge and King have really competed for this team. Along with Fernandez, nice relief pitcher additions by Mo. Though Romero has been struggling a little lately. He can be added to the list.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #258976
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    When Nootbaar returns. Do the Cardinals keep Burleson at 2 or move him into more of an RBI spot? Maybe Winn, Donovan, Burleson, Contreras, Goldy, Nootbaar, Arenado, Gorman, and Siani or Carlson.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #258915
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Currently, it’s becoming more and more obvious that the Cardinals have a dubious MOTO issue.

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258908
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Jnevel, “Burleson is more likely to decline”. Burleson is at least as good of a defensive corner outfielder as Holliday and Ozuna were. And Burleson has a very good arm. Plus, Burly could just be “scratching the surface” into his pure talent as a hitter. Let’s hope that can be said regarding Walker, fairly soon. It looks to me like Burleson is hitting his way into the regular 1B job next season. So him being in RF may be a moot subject next season.

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258841
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    ATM, that is a very solid assessment of the current Arenado situation.

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258839
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    mudville. Donovan is so solid in LF. It’s hard to move him from there. Though he is very steady at some other defensive positions, too. Don’t count Saggese out at 2B or 3B by next season. He has a lot of natural hitting ability with some “pop”.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #258838
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    I’m starting to wonder if Goldschmidt needs to also be lowered more in the lineup. He still has some production. But he too often seems helpless in the clutch. I realize the way Arenado and Gorman have performed this season. It doesn’t give Marmol many MOTO options, right now.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Jnevel, then Mo needs to come up with another viable closer at the deadline to compliment Helsley’s unavailability to perform in some close games. Also, Helsley seems to have missed quite a bit of time due to injury in the past.

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258822
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Next season. install Burleson at 1B. Use the saved Goldschmidt money on another much needed quality starting pitcher. It’s a no-brainer.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    I don’t get it. Where was Helsley tonight? I’m pretty sure many past Cardinals outstanding closers would have “answered the bell” in this important divisional game. And I’m starting to wonder about Gallegos and Romero.

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258729
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    My poor posting skills were evident in this other attempt. Let me try again. AdM, just curious, what are your “high standards” for Gorman and Walker? Both, highly-acclaimed 1st round picks.And how do you rate their potential/production compared to Burleson’s. You seem to be far more critical of Burleson than Gorman and Walker. Would Burleson even be in the lineup, right now, if you were “running the show”?

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258728
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    KCB, there’s been as lot of rent free stuff going around with others, too, for the last couple years. It’s kind of like Brian indicated. Just ignore if it’s not to another poster’s liking/standards. Brian has things under control here. But it sometimes got nasty elsewhere. The Cardinal Nation is so refreshing, conduct-wise.

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258727
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM, just curious, what are your “high standards” for Gorman and Walker? And how do you rate their potential/production compared to Burleson. Who seem to be far more critical of. Would Burleson even be lineup, right now, if you were “running the show”?

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258724
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    PadsFS, Burleson will be fine in either RF or 1B in the Cardinals lineup next season. As long as he keeps hitting, consistently. He’s probably a fairly high level DH if that’s where he ends up. However, Burly seems to prefer a defensive position in the lineup. Frankly, I don’t feel he has come close to peaking, as yet, as a hitter. I know some probably get tired of me talking about Burleson. But his production and enthusiasm are so refreshing to me as a Cardinals fan. However, I’ll try to slow down on the Burly posts. lol

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258713
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    1td, that’s funny. Arenado has a pretty good gig going financially, no doubt. Actually, so does Goldschmidt. This season, Arenado’s age/performance/salary is more perplexing.

    in reply to: Cardinals infield next season #258709
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    gscottar, that could be the case. Arenado’s salary will be hard to move.

Viewing 25 posts - 176 through 200 (of 804 total)

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years