Shady

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 804 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Doesn’t Baker deserve a good look? #263394
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    I didn’t realize Prieto had fallen off, somewhat. “At least Saggese is hot right now, so if anyone gets added to the 40-man and called up, which I do not anticipate, it would be Saggese”. That might be practical, considering how Arenado and Gorman have performed this season, overall. Next season, depending on what they want to do with Goldy, Arenado, and Gorman. An infield of Burleson, Donovan, Winn and Saggese might not be too bad. Especially, if in a rebuild mode.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263391
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Sorry to offend. IMO, baseball message boards sometime seem more complicated than necessary. It seems really easy for regular posters to just ignore what’s not appealing to them. As the monitor, that’s quite different.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263389
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    gscottar, This is just an innocent baseball message board that should be just for fun. Try not to over-analyze the personal aspect and/or over-react.

    in reply to: Roster Matrix #263383
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Brian, thanks, I was looking for that. It’s nice to see the young Saggese is making progress.

    in reply to: Roster Matrix #263381
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    I was pleased to see Saggese got some kind of Player of the Month honor.

    in reply to: Doesn’t Baker deserve a good look? #263377
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Prieto is another player that deserves a chance with the Cardinals. Maybe some starts at 3B vs RHP.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263366
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Brian, good point. However, I feel the admiration these types have expressed for Burleson’s hitting ability seems genuine. Like with me, I feel they are thrilled to have a hitting talent that can help the Cardinals win.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263364
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM, you do make a solid point with the political analogy. However, baseball is the theme here.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263327
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    RBK, posted, “Also, posts that straightforwardly present facts and data that you happen to not like because they don’t fit your preferred narrative aren’t “attacks.” ” You are correct. But some have bad intentions. They slip in personal attacks. Those are the “attacks” I’m referring to.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263325
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    RBK, that’s ridiculous, I’m an amateur poster here like all likely are. We share opinions. But, how can Average Joe posters here, pompously, feel they are more accomplished than professional baseball commentators? That’s what I’m getting at.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263314
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    RBK, it humors me. All of us amateur posters can post our thoughts. We are fans on an innocent MB. As long as there are no personal attacks. I don’t like that at all. Though I sometimes react after being attacked. I’m trying to be more resiliant.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263287
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    So, from all the brilliant data, please lay it out. Who should be batting 3, 4, and 5 for the Cardinals now? It looks to me, those with the better stats haven’t been too effective, lately.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263278
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    KCB, So if not Goldschmidt, Arenado and Burleson. Who do you suggest as viable MOBs, right now? Brian, please chime in. Who do you feel should be hitting 3 thru 5 for the Cardinals, right now? No insults intended, just a very timely question with the way the offense is struggling.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263273
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM, feels, “Commentators are paid to pimp the Cards”. Frankly, I haven’t heard notable professional Cardinals’ baseball commentators “pimp”, as you post, Gorman, Walker and even, Contreras, recently, like they have Burleson. Wonder why that is.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263267
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM, so I should place more credibility in what you post than what Joe Buck, Jim Edmonds, Mark Sweeney, Al Hrabosky, Chip Caray, etc. say regarding what they see in Burleson. It ain’t gonna happen. The difference is. You see numbers, they see raw hitting ability.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263259
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    RBK, yet, recently, some notable professional baseball commentators. Not internet Cardinals MB posters that I know of. Have claimed Burleson is the best hitter on the team and the most dangerous hitter on the team. They must not pay the attention to stats that some internet posters dwell on. Isn’t it kind of odd that some notable professional analysts think more highly of Burleson than many Average Joe MB posters do?

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263257
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Contreras hasn’t been the productive bat needed at 3, lately. Especially, vs LHP. Too many Ks, lately for a #2 or #3 hitter. Put him at 5 to relieve some pressure.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263255
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    KCB, do you consider Goldschmidt and Arenado viable MOBs?

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263245
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Go with this set lineup for a while vs RHP and LHP. It may be the Cardinals best chance of generating more offense.
    1) Winn SS
    2) Donovan LF
    3) Burleson DH
    4) Arenado 3B
    5) Contreras C
    6) Pham RF
    7) Goldschmidt 1B
    8) Gorman 2B
    9) Nootbaar CF

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263227
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Right now, Pham’s cost for next season will financially make much more sense than Goldschmidt and Arenado. The key is whether Burleson can cut it at 1B and one of the many internal options can at 3B. Hopefully, it’s Gorman. Both Burleson’s and Gorman’s compensation, next season, compared to Goldy’s and Arenado’s should help accommodate Pham’s salary and some more needed starting pitching help. Maybe even another outside outfield bat if Walker’s not ready.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263198
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM asks, “why aren’t they sitting vs lefties”? Because there’s not consistent, high level production from the high-priced RHBs against LHP. Because of that, team’s are trying to minimize Burleson, Donovan and Gorman by pitching a lot of LH starters.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #263188
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Maybe it’s time to try to establish a top of the order nucleus for the future with some talented, young hitters. Go Winn, Donovan, Burleson 123 against RHP and LHP. For now, fill in the blanks with the rest of the lineup.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    When millions and millions are spent on underachieving players. Things usually doesn’t turn out too good. This is the bottom line issue with this team.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    With the Cardinals, is it lack of talent or more of lack of production? There’s a lot of just average production going on. Especially, considering some salaries. The Cardinals need more “bang for their buck” out of some.

    in reply to: StL 2024 Game #113 thread – Sunday, August 4 at Cubs #262999
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    I like to today’s lineup with Pham batting 5 and Burleson 6, playing LF, vs the lefty. First five in the lineup are righty hitters. Nationals won over the Brewers. Cards need to pick up a game in the standings today.

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 804 total)

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years