Marilyn Green

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 232 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Burleson is going to be a fine hitter, however #244836
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I agree with Brian. Edman is the better CF and should play over Carlson when he returns. Even with less innings in CF, Edman showed much better range there than Carlson.

    Carlson is fine while Edman is out, but I have always maintained that defensively, he is better in a corner position. He doesn’t have the speed or the range that Edman has.

    Furthermore, Carlson has to show me he can hit from the left side consistently. Spring stats are meaningless. If he hits well consistently from the left side in the regular season, then I will reconsider my position.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238580
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I would venture that the bulk of the success of both is due to other teams.

    Both of those pitchers suggest that perhaps the Cardinals front office does not evaluate very well either.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238575
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Based on Gibson’s age and on stats that actually matter (of which games won is not such a stat) my answer is yes.

    Games won relies on way more than a pitcher’s skill. A good offense and defense will make a pitcher appear better than he actually is.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238572
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Frankly, based on what I have seen them do now, I don’t believe the front office ever gave a single thought to signing Yamammoto.

    I’m guessing they heard the $200 million or more prediction and said “not in our budget”.

    The only way the Cardinals will ever get an elite pitcher is to draft and develop one. Unfortunately, the draft and development genie abandoned them years ago.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238565
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    One way to get a number #1 starter is to spend money wisely. For example, don’t waste $22 million dollars on old and washed up pitchers like Lance Lynn and Kyle Gibson.

    in reply to: 2024 Rotation #238479
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    When I was in high school track I came in third in my event at a particular track meet.

    What makes that not special is there were only four people competing in my event.

    Gray had an 8-8 record in 2023. While W/L record is not a stat that is particularly indicative of skill, there are some credible baseball analysts who have pointed out that his record is unusual for a runner up in a Cy Young race.

    The point I am rather ungracefully making is that being second in the AL Cy Young race does not grant Sonny Gray some kind of pitching omnipotence nor does it suggest that he will pitch well going forward.

    I have no serious problem with Gray in a vacuum. I have a problem with anointing him a our future ace. His past record suggests he is more of a #2 starter than a #1.

    The Cardinals needs a #1 starter and they don’t have one.

    in reply to: 2024 Rotation #238477
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    LOL

    I will not suggest that I know how to run a baseball team.

    If you are asking whether about pure intellectual ability, then I might be intellectually superior but I would need more information to know for sure.

    Seriously though, just because someone is a GM does not automatically mean they are infallible with respect to putting a team together.

    One would have to believe Mozeliak has never made a mistake and I would doubt that is the case.

    in reply to: Trade Ideas/Acquisition Ideas/Non-Cards Rumors – 2021-2023 #238377
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I am more optimistic on Walker than I am about this rotation.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238376
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I regret to inform you that the Sonny Gray contract indeed includes a no trade clause.

    in reply to: 2024 Rotation #238371
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Brian is right. This rotation is not even a Division winner. It is third or fourth place at best and that is if you squint.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238338
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Also, they got Arenado basically for free for the first couple of years. They won’t get that kind of deal from the Padres.

    Soto is likely to get $30 million in arbitration. No way the Cardinals want that.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238336
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Sure, it’s money and you think the Cardinals want an outfielder they don’t need for money they aren’t willing to pay for what they do need?

    Don’t believe what Morosi says.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238320
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    If they are doing a trade, then trade for Cease or Glasnow. We don’t need another outfielder. We are trying to dump some of what we have.

    I won’t deny I wanted Yamamoto but I knew that was pie in the sky thinking for the Cardinals. They don’t do that kind of thing.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238310
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    We were supposedly in on Juan Soto once before and it was a mirage.

    Ask yourself why the Padres want to trade Soto.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238299
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    As I said, there is nothing wrong with Gray. Signing a 34 year old who has probably pitched his best season and will more likely decline is not aggressive.

    Signing one of the Japanese pitchers would fit my definition of aggressive.

    I have said my piece. The Cardinals did what they always do. Play it safe and around the margins.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238293
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Yes, it is depressing and the strategy is not likely to change anytime soon.

    The fact remains that the Cardinals are unwilling to spend big on any one player and will continue to play around the margins and hope to get lucky. That is an unexciting strategy for sure.

    If ending 2023 with the worst record in 33 years wasn’t a big enough motivator I don’t know what will be.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238287
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Yay! The pitchers who lead in home runs allowed and hits allowed all have an option.

    I get trying to make the best of this. I have just lost my ability to cover for incompetence.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238285
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    It appears the Cardinals’ excessive risk averseness and reluctance to spend money has rubbed off on some people. It is a shame.

    Starters who have shown they have the stuff are less risky than relying on arms that haven’t. You can always trade a longer term contract.

    I have no problems with hoping on minor leaguers as long as you mitigate that with some proven talent. The Cardinals don’t do that. They just sign the shorter term contracts on the middle tier pitchers and rely on their ever dwindling luck of the draft.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238276
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    There have always been prospects that have promise. When was the last time the minor leagues produced a No. 1 starter?

    It looked like Flaherty might be, but injuries derailed that.

    They have been trying to make Liberatore into a starter for a while. He hasn’t worked out.

    Thompson has shown something lately but I am not holding my breath. The rest are lottery tickets.

    I personally am not counting on any of them.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238265
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    They are likely done with the rotation and will add some bullpen arms and be done.

    There is nothing inherently wrong with Gray. He is 34 years old and will not be good for three years.

    The problem is they haven’t done anything for the long term. They are just putting things off for another year hoping to get lucky with the arms in the minor leagues. That strategy hasn’t worked out in a long time.

    in reply to: Sonny Gray #238249
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    It’s a very underwhelming move.

    They will have to do this all over again next year. Probably plenty of old and cheap guys to get though.

    in reply to: 2024 Rotation #238244
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Might as well go get Rich Hill and raise the average age of the rotation closer to 40.

    in reply to: 2023 StL Game #131: Sunday, August 27 at Phillies #232710
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I have mixed feelings about bullpens as a general rule.

    On the one hand, relief pitchers are fungible, as they are often nothing more than pitchers with limitations in one form or another that make them not good starter material. It may be the lack of pitch variation for instance.

    On the other hand, building a bullpen, imo, should start with choosing pitchers whose pitches are quality and who have had success with the most important rule of pitching, which is getting outs.

    My issue with the Cardinals approach of building a bullpen in part with other team’s rejects is that other team’s rejects more often than not aren’t quality pitchers who are good at getting outs. Hence, that is why they are rejects.

    If there are quality pitchers in your system that aren’t starter material then by all means put them in the bullpen.

    However if you don’t have enough quality pitchers in your system, then you acquire them through trade or free agency. The Cardinals should do more of that and less of shopping in the Clearance Aisle.

    in reply to: 2023 StL Game #131: Sunday, August 27 at Phillies #232662
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I didn’t watch the game. I did follow on Gameday as I was doing other things.

    With that caveat, I saw that Marmol commented after the game that the players were competing hard (my paraphrase I’m not looking up the quote).

    I have been out there mostly alone in defending Marmol. Mainly because I don’t think he has a lot of choices. There is way more wrong with this team that is out of his control.

    Nevertheless, I heard that and my first thought was to be skeptical. I just don’t see how this talented offense can be competing hard and be this bad.

    Let’s be honest, when you are this far out of contention, there has to be the thought of not injuring yourself in pursuit of futility. In some part of my brain I can see the reasonableness of that.

    I guess what I am saying is that I think Marmol is likely bullsh*tting us and I am not sure I blame him. PR still matters.

    Then again maybe they are competing hard and they are just that bad.

    in reply to: 2023 StL Game #73: Monday, June 19 at Nats #225004
    Marilyn Green
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Well in this case we would be choosing Carlson over DeJong.

    That is a wash as far as I am concerned.

Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 232 total)

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years