Gagliano

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 446 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Coming into tonight, we were 4 back in the playoff race and 3 ahead of the team with the 6th spot in the lottery. If Walker is out for significant time, we might just drift toward the latter pretty quickly.

    Good night for Dobbins. Twice a runner at third with one out and they can’t get them home.

    jnevel-

    I was struck by the same thing. The Yanks had a lefty face him, presumably for a reason. Any sense of what has changed for Herrera?

    in reply to: Minor League Game thread – 2026 Week 20 #315345
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    He’s fanned 8 times in those 27 ABs, which is a lot. But before he struck out a remarkable 40 times in 73 ABs. Curious if we’ll hear about him on the podcast in the morning…

    in reply to: Minor League Game thread – 2026 Week 20 #315338
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Gorman pops another HR. 5th in his last 27 ABs. Maybe he’s figured something out?

    in reply to: Too early 40 man protection #315335
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Maybe Hancel Rincon, though probably not. Or Randel Clemente. Since June 26, he’s fanned 30 in 15.2 ip at AA, giving up just 2 runs, both in the same outing. He’s walked 12, which is less than ideal. But that’s a lot of k’s.

    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Burly’s wRC+ is up to 129, and Walker’s is down to 130. Their OPS is .830 and .834, respectively. They both now have 2.4 bWAR, though Walker leads in fWAR 3.2 to 2.3.

    Burly and Walker’s OPS is roughly 100 points better than the next on the team, Wetherholt at .738, followed by Herrera (.732) and (in many fewer ABs) Torres at .725.

    in reply to: Roster Matrix thread 2 #315309
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Hah!

    And it’s Mathews who gets sent down to make room for Ferguson. So looks like we will get run of Dobbins in the rotation. I had thought someone official said they wanted to keep Mathews up, but maybe the extensive use of relievers caused this move? Dunno.

    in reply to: Roster Matrix thread 2 #315304
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Either more work for Baez or keeping his rookie eligibility for next year.

    But I’m surprised it’s Prieto instead of Saggese. Saggese is more versatile defensively and seems to have been hitting better at Memphis. Saggese’s OPS was .808 in July to Prieto’s .681. Maybe they have Saggese working on something and want him to continue? Or they want him to play, but Prieto’s job will be to ride the bench? Or they’re hoping Prieto can show something so we can get something for him in the offseason when we need to clear roster space? Weird.

    But yeah, I’d think of a lot of Torres and Fermin in LF, at least for the next 10 days or so.

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315248
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    In his last 7 outings, Mautz has given up 3, 0, 0, 2, 0, 3, and 3 runs. That’s 11 runs in 11.1 ip, with 12 walks. I’d guess they don’t think he’s ready, but think he has enough to offer that if they can let him develop more before throwing him to the wolves he might be ok.

    Springfield has a 3 game lead in the 2nd half, and the 2nd place team doesn’t really count since they won the first half, so it’s really a 6 game lead.

    Are they creating a core–Doyle, Franklin, Hjerpe, Eagen, Lin, Clarke when through rehab, maybe even bullpen guys like Santana and Clemente; position players Raniel, Je Baez, Ortiz, Ragsdale, Peete, Cho–to go for the Texas League championship this year and the International League championship next year, and then play in St. Louis as Memphis Mafia 2 in 2028?

    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Offense helped more by the short porch in right or by knowing the trading deadline is past and no one with at least two years of team control was dealt, so the core might stick it through together?

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315199
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Eagen looks interesting, and I’d slide him into that list of players ranked 7-20. Hard to see Arizona’s 5th prospect not being interesting. Not only are his numbers likely elevated by pitching in a hard place to pitch, he had a terrible April but seems to have pitched better since. ERA of 8.71 in April, then 3.79, 4.37, 3.24. And his walks dropped in July, just 5 in 25 innings, after 11 in 22 in June.

    Santana seems like a lottery ticket for a lefty reliever.

    We won’t know the names on the PTBNL. There are probably conditions where the player(s) we can pick from depends on what Noot does.

    I can’t imagine them dropping Stanek. Getting Ferguson tells me they want to have some veteran bullpen work for the end of the season. They’ve seen enough games lost late, and I’d think that a weak bullpen has weighed on the offense.

    I’d imagine either Strzelecki or Gastelum gets sent down. Is there something they’ve identified for Gastelum to work on in AAA for a bit?

    I’m curious with Dobbins coming back which of the 6 starters goes to the pen. After the last game, and after getting a lefty reliever I don’t think it’s Libby, so Dobbins seems like the most sense, unless they decide to limit Leahy’s innings. But he’s only thrown 107 and he threw 88 last year, so seems like they would be a way from the point they’d need to limit his innings.

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315157
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I was definitely jumping the gun suggesting a Cho promotion. I think Saggese has been hitting better, so he’d make some sense as a callup.

    I take the Ferguson signing to be a signal they don’t think Mautz is ready for an MLB bullpen yet and could use a couple months.

    I don’t have a good sense of the arms for the Nootbaar trade yet, but Kyle seems happy. One rumor is that there is another player in this trade, but didn’t signal which team would send the player.

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315135
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Or at least long enough to preserve Baez’ rookie eligibility! Could mean Cho to AAA?

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315133
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Does the Noot trade mean a Baez promotion is imminent?

    I will miss Noot. Very curious if the package we got now is better than what we would have gotten if we waited till the offseason.

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315125
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    One point contra something Brian said…I think May has legit upside. He looked like a monster at times this year, and it’s plausible to think that he will be better next year, a further year from his health problems. I’m ok dealing him, but I really hope he does not resign with the Brewers. I’d hate to have to face him within division.

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315120
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    First thought is Frias 6th. I am pretty high on Bernal. I’m much less sure re where I’d put Ragsdale. I keep reordering the next 14 in my rankings (Mathews, Hjerpe, Clarke, Condon, Ragsdale, Roby, Kuhns, Peete, the other Baez, Gurevitch, Cijntje, Fajardo, Odle). And then I try to figure out where to fit the young guys, Dos Santos, Luna, Cruz, Maniscalso, Padilla, Hernandez…Probably 11th for Ragsdale, but could easily see either higher or lower by a couple?

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315111
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Baseball America as of 30 minutes ago lists Frias 5th and Ragsdale 11th among the 57 traded prospects as of that time.

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315105
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    That we got a top 100 guy and he’s not in the Brewers’ top 10 per MLB made me realize it’s gonna be a slog against them for awhile.

    Two AA CFs makes sense for a team looking at a 2028 window. Church or a rental next year?

    I’m not too worried re two LH OFs. Walker will hopefully be around awhile as RH. Joshua Baez is RH. Hopefully they cover that angle for a good while.

    One other benefit of the May extravaganza is that he’s proof of concept. I’d think his experience would make it easier for us to sign some other pitcher to a one year for the next couple years.

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315091
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    AA OF of Ragsdale, Peete, and Cho?

    in reply to: 2026 Season Trades #315078
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I am unsure how rational it is, but I’d feel much worse if we traded with the Cubs. Though I probably respect the Brewers’ front office more, so worry that they are more likely to fleece us. But in Chaim I trust.

    MLB lists Frias as the Brewers’ 11th prospect, Ragsdale 13th. Both OFs.

    BA lists Frias as the 100th best prospect in baseball.

    • This reply was modified 2 days, 13 hours ago by Gagliano.
    • This reply was modified 2 days, 13 hours ago by Gagliano.
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Agree with jnevel re Libby. Makes it harder for me to say who I want to be the 5 starters down the stretch, assuming May is traded. I’d like both Dobbins and Mathews to pitch, but there’s only room for one.

    Good to get that win in the last game before the trade deadline. I wonder if they settle at all after the deadline.

    in reply to: Minor League Game thread – 2026 Week 19 #314955
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Gorman is 6 of his last 23 with 5 BBs and 4 HR’s. He had only 4 HR in his first 83 AAA ABs. Has he figured something out? If so, do you keep him and try him at 3B again in a little bit? It’s not like we have lots of good 3B options…

    in reply to: 2026 Players and Pitchers of the Month #314853
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Thanks, Brian. Surprised by the Gastelum, decision, but the other three certainly have crossed the line.

    in reply to: 2026 Players and Pitchers of the Month #314811
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    good call on Gurevitch, both Brian and jnevel!

    Can someone remind me the criteria for when a player becomes ineligible for the prospect list? I know 130 PA’s counts. Jordan is at 126 so is very likely to hit 130 today. But Crooks is just at 95, Torres at 89. Crooks will be a close thing by August 15, and Torres probably doesn’t get there.

    But do we count 45 days active on the MLB roster? If so, both have used up their eligibility.

    Thanks. I think those are the only three who have a strong chance to rotate off by Aug 15.

    in reply to: Buyers or sellers #313858
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    There was mention in this thread about calling up Baez in mid-August. But Baez has been struggling of late. OPS of .575 in July. Now, that’s better than Gorman (.573), Saggese (.446), and Scott (.524), but it suggests to me that me might still need to work on things a bit. His non-intentional walk rate is up this month. 8 BB to 54 AB (12.9%) in July, compared to 22 BB in 281 AB (7.3%) before that. I’ve not watched, but I wonder if they are trying to get him to be more selective.

    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Whew indeed! Feels like another 1-5 road trip with another blown lead would have set up too many memories of last year.

    I’m surprised Miami has lost 8 in a row. They were my bet for the main competition for that last playoff spot.

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 446 total)

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years