Shady

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 301 through 325 (of 804 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Burleson sinking faster than the Titanic! #255861
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    If somebody has access to a recent trade value chart, please tell me Nootbaar’s, Carlson’s and Burleson’s current trade values. TIA.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #255813
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    blingboy, I prefer more speed at #2 than Burleson has. However, if Winn’s at 1B after a single or walk, Burly should get some fastballs to hammer. And Burly’s recent power surge makes it nice to have him with a better chance at that 5th AB in the game.

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #255790
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    blingboy, are you good with Burleson at #2?

    in reply to: Potential Cardinals lineup #255786
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    blingboy, Contreras at #3, Goldy at #5 and Arenado at #6 ?

    in reply to: Burleson sinking faster than the Titanic! #255753
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    I recognized Burleson’s talent way before 90% of other posters on some popular Cardinals message boards. Some were nasty because I supported Burly though the stats didn’t show it. Many are still in denial of his success. Some making chide remarks still. Strange behavior. Just enjoy what I projected a long tome ago. Cheers!

    in reply to: Burleson sinking faster than the Titanic! #255738
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    It’s pretty cool to see Winn’s overall evolution as an MLB hitter. And Burleson’s power is starting to evolve in addition to Gorman’s. Now, if Walker can start clicking at the MLB level. The Cards might really have an exciting offense.

    in reply to: Burleson sinking faster than the Titanic! #255726
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    To complicate the lineup possibilities even further. What lineup will Oli go with when both Contreras and Nootbaar return? One way or the other, it’s going to be a fairly deep lineup. Especially, when when Edman also returns. Brian, I’d be particularly interested in what your lineup would be.

    in reply to: Burleson sinking faster than the Titanic! #255722
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Dang BOCfan, you are becoming more obsessed with Burly than me. lol

    in reply to: Burleson sinking faster than the Titanic! #255719
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    What’s your Cardinals lineup when Contreras returns? The top six will be very interesting.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    BOCfan, do you still feel Burleson should be at Memphis? You sure seem to dwell on Burleson for some reason.

    in reply to: Is it time to move Arenado? #255662
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Brian, didn’t the Cardinals “eat” part of Fowler’s salary to move him?

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255594
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM, “Period and end of conversation!” Glad you are giving it up. But that’s doubtful.I stuck my neck out supporting Burleson through his development. You have often dissed Burleson and me in the process. Please enjoy what I’ve been telling you for years about what to expect. Some can project talent. Some can’t.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255593
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    KCB. that’s lame, please relax. Burleson is a future star whether you want me to discuss my support for him or not. I like the way the organization has produced really solid offensive players like Donovan, Gorman, Winn, and Burleson. Now they need to develop some starting pitching like that.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255591
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    AdM, you’ve bashed Burleson like this a bunch. “He’s an incredibly mediocre MLB hitter!”. The Cardinals and myself disagree. To each their own. Is the farm still available? lol

    in reply to: Is it time to move Arenado? #255588
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    If DeWitt is willing to eat half of Arenado’s remaining contract. Mo should be able to get a very good young pitcher or outfield bat in return. Maybe both if the right team comes into play.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255582
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    And I’m nauseated by hyper-sensitive posters that have undermined Burleson and me for supporting him for a couple seasons. Now, many of the doubters of the past are jumping on board for Burleson. Many of the doubters now have a problem admitting that my loyalty in the past, not their’s, is coming to fruition. Message boards are so entertaining. At least this one is fairly civil.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Three observations. It won’t happen, but when Contreras gets back in the lineup, neither Goldschmidt or Arenado should bat higher than #6 in the lineup against RHP. Second, be careful about taking Burleson out of a close game with the lead late when he could bat again in a pressure situation late. Burly’s not that bad defensively and he’s a helluva a threat at the plate. And Roycroft is pitching his way into some high leverage relief opportunities.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255544
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    The anti Shady/Burly crowd are showing their true selves again. Just the same. Burleson has hit a number of ground balls this season within reach of MLB infielders that were hit so hard that MLB infielders couldn’t handle them. Very, very impressive velo. I wish some of them were over the fence. The anti Burly crowd can’t seem to fathom just how consistently hard Burleson hits MLB pitching. They likely feel he should be at Memphis. lol

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255508
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    Maybe I overdo it with Burleson. But he has helped keep the Cardinals team heads above water since Contreras went down. There was some discussion this week between by some quality local radio personalities speculating that Burleson is the best hitter the team, right now. The way Burly, Winn and Gorman have progressed. Get Goldy and Arenado going. Add Contreras and Edman and the Cardinals might have something going. Carlson could be “icing on the cake” if he gets it going. Of course, the pitching needs to hold up.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255490
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    ATM, that’s interesting. Just curious, did you project Burleson’s development into a very good MLB hitter? Many posters really doubted him as he was developing at the MLB level. I just liked his bat to ball skills. Regardless of the stats at the time. I believe there’s more power to come from Burly.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255488
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    BOCfan, you underestimated Burleson, too. Some posters have a better ability to project than others. Saggese is going to be a very good MLB hitter. Not sure if either Burleson or Saggese will be able to put up the numbers preferred at 1B. But I wouldn’t count them out just yet.

    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    A nice offensive lineup today. With Winn and Burly at the top and Carp and Carlson at 8 and 9. Need some slugging from Goldy, Gorman and Arenado in the middle.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255478
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    The possible replacements at 1B is also an interesting consideration. Gorman, Burleson, Walker among them. And I’m pretty sure Saggese could be groomed to play 1B. If his bat would merit it with no openings at 2B or 3B.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255473
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    blingboy, IMO, you are underestimating Saggese, Prieto and, maybe even, Fermin. They are very good young players. Burleson had plenty of doubters for a while. He’s turning out pretty darn good. Same could happen with Saggese, Prieto and Fermin.

    in reply to: Trading Block/Deadline Players #255471
    Shady
    Blocked

    Free

    What? I’m just saying these are all good players that could play these infield positions. Arenado and Walker would likely be limited to 3B. There seems to be an abundance of talent at 2B and 3B. Realistically, they all can’t play regularly for the Cardinals at 2B and/or 3B. So some might be expendable as trade chips.

Viewing 25 posts - 301 through 325 (of 804 total)

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years