Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Bling, he’s Rule 5 eligible at the end of this season, but if he isn’t taken, he still has a few years of team control left.
He and Peete are the 2 guys competing with Scott/Church for the CF job of the future. I would love for Davis to win that competition because he has the most upside, but odds-wise, I might rate his chances right now as lowest of the four to win the job.
Thanks for kicking this off “25”!
Let’s go a couple weeks after the season. I will have my eye on the AFL and that should play out by the time we get to where those guys will be on the list.
Without one of their best hitters in Deniel Ortiz (IL), the Springfield Cardinals still are sending out a lineup tonight with only 1 guy whose season stats are below a .800 OPS – their number 9 hitter and catcher Ryan Campos at .778. Hitting is inflated in the Texas League, but still this is pretty incredible.
It is called the Sawamura award named after a famous Japanese pitcher.
I do wonder if they might stay 100% internal other than maybe 1 bullpen guy signing. Even if a salary floor gets adopted, it may not take effect immediately. And, if it does, they could get there with extensions. By the look of things now, if all the prospects keep developing at the same pace as they have been, they should be major league average or better at every position by 2028 so I could understand the logic in not investing in a single free agent who blocks advancement.
I think CF carries the greatest internal risk of not getting someone by 2028 so if they did sign a free agent to more than a one year deal, I’d expect it to be there. Unlikely, but to me the most likely of all the unlikelies.
For the starting rotation though, I don’t think they need to sign anyone. If they could find a Dustin May, then sure. But those deals often don’t pan out so it would be hard to replicate that success. They have 5-7 guys now who can start in 2027, plus they should have an incredible 5-6 starters at Memphis who all just need between 2 months and 6 months before they should be good to go.
-
This reply was modified 3 weeks ago by
Jnevel.
I like that the roster is now what it very well could be come Spring Training (whenever that occurs). There are no more obvious free agents or roster cuts. 38 players plus Rajcic on the 60 day IL.
Even so,there are still some potential cuts/trades:
Bruihl
Stanek
Prieto
Pereira
Fernandez
Gorman
Fermin
One of the catchers not named BernalHowever, all of them could be back. We will see.
I like this move. It allows more at bats for Fermin and Saggese by letting Urias go. And, no reason to let Strzlecki pitch over our rookies at this point with nothing else to play for this season.
September 16, 2026 at 10:15 am in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #153 thread – Wednesday, Sept. 16 vs. San Francisco Giants #319013Enjoy the game firsthand “64”!
There’s a shutdown period between the end of the college season and the draft. It’s a bit risky to ramp all those arms back up after sitting cold following a long season. In general, the team is trying to protect its prized assets. The assets they draft in the later rounds are less protected and probably get the option to start throwing again if they want and if they prove they can do so effectively, they get an opportunity to play.
September 15, 2026 at 7:00 pm in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #152 thread – Tuesday, Sept. 15 vs. San Francisco Giants #318968Some rough defense to start this one as Pallante had to collect 5 outs in the first.
I think that last piece you said is what drove my comment, Brian. There almost certainly is a higher risk. And ramp up or not, going out and throwing 102 in your first outing after coming back pushes that risk higher. We don’t have the calculus of how much higher. But a reasonable person would assume it’s higher. And my assumption, supported by some loose evidence, is that he threw that hard without coaching support to make a statement and get noticed.and he did get noticed – a lot. Then the coaches weighed in and he has now backed off that velocity some. Pure speculation, but reasonable speculation based on outcomes. And now I worry that sending him to the AFL puts a spotlight back on him without our coaching staff hovering over him. I reserve the right to say I told you so when he gets hurt after an AFL stint.
Go figure. I got a mere 1 correct with Dohm. I did mention Roby (or at least I thought strongly about him) and Hernandez as possibilities. I didn’t even realize Elissalt was back healthy enough to pitch. Pretty much the same with Roby as he didn’t appear in a single contest this season.
The one that truly surprises me here is Watson. He’s had a pretty terrible year. Maybe he’s working on something new and just needs some time with it?
I like the McGee and Peete picks. Peete has had a great year on offense, but he’s also missed lots of little slivers of time. McGee is a guy who has had a ho-hum season up until he recently got promoted to AA and then he has taken off.
I worry about Clarke. He came back from 27 injuries (maybe exaggerating a bit) and started immediately throwing 100+. That was a way of saying “look at me and what I can do”. And now we plan to send him to the AFL where all minor league eyes will be on him. What will he do for an encore and how much is that going to cost us?
He really had a great year with the bat. It’s also helped him having so many other guys getting on base in front of him. That certainly contributes to the RBI total.
Between both Baez’s, Raniel Rodriguez, Jack Gurevitch, Tai Peete, and for the most part Deniel Ortiz and Leo Bernal, we have had some outstanding offensive performances this season. In addition, we acquired two guys from the Brewers who were also having outstanding years in Frias and Ragsdale. That’s almost a whole team of exceptional offensive prospects right there. There were also quite a few “very good” offensive seasons from many others out there (Colton Ledbetter, Sammy Hernandez, Yordalin Peña, and Ryan Campos – just to name the ones who first come to mind).
September 14, 2026 at 8:25 pm in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #151 thread – Monday, Sept. 14 vs. San Francisco Giants #318885Joe was Phil Niekro’s brother.
Yeah, I doubt any other brothers have done it. Maybe cousins?
GPT says only Ken and Bob.
Some other notable families: Dizzy & Paul Dean, Ramon & Pedro Martinez, Mel Sr, Todd, and Mel Jr Stottlemeyer, and the 4 Leiters (Al, Mark, Jack, & Mark Jr).
Probably not. Certainly not for Joshua and probably not for Jesus. I’m not sure he’s going to be ok at 3B either. He still needs to get better all around at defense.
September 13, 2026 at 8:51 pm in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #151 thread – Monday, Sept. 14 vs. San Francisco Giants #318816You have to play lots of close games that you happen to be winning late to accumulate saves. Those other guys are probably better than O’Brien but they just get fewer qualifying save opportunities.
September 13, 2026 at 8:21 pm in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #151 thread – Monday, Sept. 14 vs. San Francisco Giants #318812It essentially says if Graceffo was pitching in front of an average defense with an average batting average on balls put in play against him going to that defense in an average park size, he would be expected to have an ERA of 4.90 or something like that. It’s generally a better predictive stat to guess at future production than using ERA and certainly more predictive than using wins and losses for relievers . . . but it’s far from perfect. I think it also uses strikeout and walk rates in the formula. I don’t either like it or hate it. It does seem to work better for certain kinds of pitchers than others.
But Graceffo is still likely to be pitching half his games in Busch stadium next season and he is likely to mostly have Winn and Wetherholt behind him again. So that part of the formula is already messed up.
-
This reply was modified 3 weeks, 3 days ago by
Jnevel.
September 13, 2026 at 7:14 pm in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #151 thread – Monday, Sept. 14 vs. San Francisco Giants #318807XFIP says Graceffo is our worst reliever among the 9 with 20 or more innings pitched. ERA says he’s the best reliever we have at 2.61. He also now leads our bullpen with 73 IP. One could argue he’s been the MVP of the pen this season. One could also argue he’s just been lucky with a batting average on balls in play insanely low around .200 and an unsustainable 6.3% HR/Fly Ball rate – hence why his XFIP is so bad. What do you all think?
Brian, I hope you created a shortcut key for “Raniel Rodriguez” this season given the number of times you’ve had to type his name somewhere in the list of players of the day!
September 12, 2026 at 8:21 pm in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #149 thread – Saturday, Sept. 12 vs. Chicago White Sox #318753Like Baez’ opening day, Hjerpe got a little too overhyped. He is a good player and should be good for some time, but still is learning and trying to come back from a long injury.
September 12, 2026 at 8:17 pm in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #149 thread – Saturday, Sept. 12 vs. Chicago White Sox #318751Hjerpe all sorts of off tonight. This seems to happen to him from time to time where his mechanics get off. Tonight is exceptionally bad though.
One guy who doesn’t get talked about hardly at all who is having an amazing season is Jack Gurevitch. He’s played at 3 levels this season and been successful at all 3. I saw a post yesterday that he is the first minor leaguer since the draft began to hit over 30 home runs in his first full season (he eclipsed that tonight as he’s now hit another). He does strike out way too much. But this guy is an amazing hitter otherwise who deserves more recognition.
“27” – It’s 38 players. But it only applies to guys who are eligible to be taken which is either 3 or 4 years in depending on their age when drafted. I wouldn’t worry about it. I don’t think it’s a pressing issue, but I haven’t done all the background work to make sure yet. Besides, odds are there won’t be a Rule 5 draft at all.
September 9, 2026 at 8:14 am in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #146 thread –Tuesday, Sept. 8 at San Francisco Giants #318521Pugs is easily our commentator of the year (again) for all his fun quips! Kudos for the effort that 1TD puts in as well.
I woke up this morning to see this one didn’t go so well. Clearly, we were offensively challenged. Mathews will bear this loss (because that’s the way wins/losses get arbitrarily assigned), but the offense deserves the L.
September 8, 2026 at 9:27 am in reply to: St. Louis 2026 Game #146 thread –Tuesday, Sept. 8 at San Francisco Giants #318434We now have 7 players from the ‘22 draft that have made the big league club: Scott, Church, Crooks, Mautz, Rajcic, Winquest , and Hjerpe. That’s a pretty incredible number.
In general, our even year drafts have been far superior to our odd year drafts. 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and now 2022 have all been good to excellent drafts. For the odd years, 2015 was very good, but 2017 was about as poor as you can get. 2019 was mostly a bust. 2021 has some promise with McGreevey, Graceffo, and Baez but we shall see how that plays out. Mathews is the first player to be called up from 2023.
-
This reply was modified 3 weeks ago by
-
AuthorPosts
