2026 Players and Pitchers of the Month

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum 2026 Players and Pitchers of the Month

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #306430
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    I am pretty sure the Cardinals will select a higher ranked prospect as their choice. Several others have good cases, but I like Flores’ solid results across the board.

    #306432
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Thanks, Brian! I was waiting for this to compare to last year. I don’t know how meaningful year to year comparisons are, but heck.

    There are 11 on the list this year to 9 for last year, but more interesting to me, there are more younger prospects. I arbitrarily selected 23 or younger as “younger prospects”. Better would be age relative to league, but I’m lazy. This year we have 7 of them–Flores, Gurevitch, Rodriguez, Jordan, Peete, Nickens, Suarez. Last year it was just 3, Kross, Curialle, and Rivas. The older 6 were Barrero, Mendoza, Vilade, Lloyd, Torres, and Prieto. That the last two are the only repeaters, and that last year’s didn’t include Rodriguez, maybe means this should just be filed. But I’m instead going to take it as an encouraging sign of things to come.

    #306497
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    This was a really close month for hitters. Lots of good ones to choose from. I probably would have picked Blaze Jordan, but I’m also supportive of the Flores selection. Torres and Peete also would have been equally great picks. Lots of good hitters. That’s a very positive thing considering all the focus seems to have been on bringing in pitching.

    #306532
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #306533
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Makes sense. I figured it would probably be Van Dyke. I really like Fajardo though and everything I’m seeing from him. I didn’t know hardly anything about him until the trade and now he’s probably the pitcher I’m most excited about. Him or Franklin anyway. And Hjerpe if he can ever get and stay healthy.

    #306539
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    *Bling Rant Alert*

    Yesterday, McGreevy pitched what these days is considered a gem, six shutout innings. His K/BB on the day was 1, 3 Ks and 3 BBs. A few days earlier Skenes needed 102 pitches to go 5 innings, striking out 9 and walking none, while giving up 4 earned runs and taking the loss. I don’t know, but I guess Skenes velo was better than McGreevy’s.

    Hopefully the new Chaim crowd noticed that. I think the Mo crowd fell into thinking that whatever their tech could readily measure was all that mattered, not just with pitchers, but hitters too. I hope they take note of the absence of high velo wiffle ball arms in the current Cardinals rotation. I hope they notice that pitchers like that who come up as starters end up as IL fixtures not rotation mainstays.

    Reality is there to be observed, but it defies measurement. What is hard to objectively measure, cannot be objectively quantified. What can’t be objectively quantified makes unreliable input. Unreliable input is best excluded from statistical modeling systems, which is what always happens and leads to problems, not just in baseball. Hopefully Chaim’s people know all that, but I harbor doubts.

    There are exceptions to everything. Big money teams can see what hot arms manage to make it into an MLB rotation and spend whatever it takes to get them. Then when they break down, eat the contract and hire another one. The Cardinals will never be able to do that. They need to develop starters that will end up in the MLB rotation, not perpetually on the IL. Over reliance on measurables and statistical modelling will not get them there, as the Mo crowd found out.

    #306547
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I think the issue is in finding and training guys like McGreevey. It’s easier to measure velocity and pitch movement and train for those. Most guys who don’t have those things get destroyed. In fairness, part of what got McGreevey over the hump was adding a bit of velocity and movement to his stuff – at least initially.

    #306548
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    It’s easier to measure velocity and pitch movement and train for those. Most guys who don’t have those things get destroyed. I

    Most guys who don’t get destroyed, most guys who do don’t last. The pyramid narrows toward the top.

    #306549
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Yesterday, McGreevy pitched what these days is considered a gem, six shutout innings. His K/BB on the day was 1, 3 Ks and 3 BBs. A few days earlier Skenes needed 102 pitches to go 5 innings, striking out 9 and walking none, while giving up 4 earned runs and taking the loss. I don’t know, but I guess Skenes velo was better than McGreevy’s.

    Are you trying to say that McGreevy is better than Skenes based off one start or even month? If so that is some good comedy. I like McGreevy, but he isn’t even close to the same level as Skenes and is multiple behind at that.

    Talk to me again when McGreevy got 3rd in the Cy Young vote in a partial year and won it with a dominant year the next year. Skenes has power stuff that lets him dominate but also elite command and rarely walks guys while hitting his spots. He had a down start. But Skenes and Skubal are the only 2 true aces in MLB. Both are complete, true pitchers and I don’t know what else could ask from them.

    #306550
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I hope the new regime will get a pragmatic streak and and make more decisions based on actual results and less decisions based on velocity, round drafted, prospect rankings, and bonuses paid. Look at the current Memphis rotation. You have four lefties in Mathews, Mautz, Zimmerman, and Hansen to go along with Dobbins.

    Of the four lefties, and setting aside the obligatory small sample size alert, Mathews has the worst overall 2026 numbers but yet would probably be the first lefty considered for promotion by most. Personally I could care less about draft rank, prospect rank, and velocity. I just want a guy who can get outs.

    Doing prospect rankings can be a fun exercise but the danger is that they can become a self fulfilling prophecy and can distort our reality. We want “our guy” to do well because it makes us look smart therefore we rationalize things we shouldn’t rationalize. Instead we should just lets the stats tell the story.

    #306562
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Are you trying to say that McGreevy is better than Skenes based off one start or even month?

    I am not saying who is better than who. I am saying it does not take 9 strike outs to win, and 9 strike outs does not mean you will win. It does not make sense to exclude prospects based upon a factor which is not critical to success. That being the case, it seems misguided to rate, rank, evaluate or judge pitchers on that basis, or to over weight that aspect. It will be interesting to check back in two years, in five years, and see how those two pitchers are doing.

    #306576
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Wrobleski just struck out zero in 6 IP in the 4-1 win over the Cards.

    #307148
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    The Cardinals finally made their choices. They couldn’t decide between Jordan and Gurevitch so made them co-Players of the Month. And they selected Fajardo as their top pitcher in April.

    #307152
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual
    #308387
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I recently learned on Fangraphs you can go to the Game Log section for minor league players and put in a date range to get some more advanced stats for a prospect. You can use this to get wRC+ which lets have a number to compare players performances across different levels and account for the league offensive environment.

    https://www.fangraphs.com/players/joshua-baez/sa3017022/game-log?position=NP&gds=2026-05-01&gde=2026-05-31&season=&type=-2

    You can also use it to see pitchers K% and BB% in a given month which are more informative than K/9 and BB/9.

    Sharing here in case it helps with the data collection for the player of the month.

    #308389
    stlcard25
    Participant

    I like that feature too, AtM. I use it often to see how guys have been doing when it feels like I’ve seen them on a hot streak for a while. Interestingly, Baez, for as a crazy of a month as he’s had, “only” has a 159 wRC+ this month. The AAA run environment is a bit nuts.

    #308814
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Thank you for the assist, ATM. I appreciate it!

    #308815
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #308816
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Great to see so many players have an excellent May. I agree with picking Cho. It’s been awhile since he was good. Glad to see him put together a fantastic month.

    #308817
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I agree with the choice of Cho despite the very high BABIP. He has improved his play a lot this month and maybe can take the Baez route. Dattalo I wanted more time with age appropriate competition.

    Dos Santos has really impressed overall. He tapped into some power this month and his line drive rate was 39.5%. I wonder how much longer he has in the FCL. Maybe a month? I would like him to get the promotion to Palm Beach maybe July to finish out the year.

    Crooks I really like seeing the K% down a good amount from where it was at 23.4%.

    #308828
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Albert – Dattalo was moved to Palm Beach a little over a week ago so some of his numbers are from there. He is still doing well.

    #308960
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Just like on the hitting side, there were a lot of good pitching candidates.

    #308961
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Good to see lots of solid candidates again. Maybe not quite as high end as the hitters, but good nonetheless. I probably would go Rajcic based on the numbers, but I’m fine with it being Odle. He just needs to quickly advance because of his age.

    #308973
    Gagliano
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I’d heard good things re Rajcic, but hadn’t looked closely at the numbers. Very encouraging. I wonder if at some point they will drop Roycroft and add Rajcic to the 40-man. And I wonder what sort of log jam they will face for the 40-man in the offseason as they build up the minors.

    #308976
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I was going to say its kind of severe to ding Jesus Garcia over 4 innings at PB, but then I realized the praise was based upon 8 innings at FCL. I guess scale matters. But the move of Garcia to an age inappropriate league, and the consequent struggle, calls to mind Rainiel. I know, its Rainiel, so I fully expect to get hit in the faced with a pom pom, but side from that, at what point is it OK to wonder if he should be in a less age inappropriate league, given his rough first 17 games?

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 31 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years