Trade Ideas/Acquisition Ideas/Non-Cards Rumors – 2021-2023

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum Trade Ideas/Acquisition Ideas/Non-Cards Rumors – 2021-2023

Viewing 25 posts - 2,251 through 2,275 (of 2,445 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #238089
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    To me, Donovan should be the opening day LF, Edman should be the opening day SS.

    They have roughly $27 million left, plus if they trade O’Neill and Gallegos, they can free up another $11 million.

    #238090
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    I agree Bling. But I think in trading with the White Sox, you are trading prospects, not MLB players.

    #238092
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    In terms of trading Burleson, Washington & the Yankees look like the best bets.

    Of course, if the Cardinals don’t upgrade the rotation, we’ll need him when we trade Goldschmidt at the deadline.

    #238096
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I am curious who you would put on the active roster to replace O’Neill and Gallegos. And Burleson.

    #238097
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    I would be trying to trade combinations involving O’Neill, Carlson, Gallegos for relief pitching upgrades.

    The idea is the whole of the three is greater than the sum of the parts. This is especially true if I can trade all three to Detroit and can get two of their three best relievers in return.

    Burleson, I would strictly trade for prospects with the Yankees. With Washington, I would try to package Burleson + Carlson (or prospects) for Hunter Harvey.

    #238099
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    We need outfield coverage on the active roster, is what I am getting at.

    #238100
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    Adam Duvall usually signs for $5-7 million. He is a perfectly fine 4th outfielder.

    LF – Donovan
    CF – Nootbaar
    RF – Palacios
    4th OF – Duvall
    5th OF – Siani/Gomez

    SS/6th OF – Edman
    DH/7th OF – Walker

    #238102
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I figured it would be something like that. The position player half of the active roster would be those 7, Contreras, Herrera, Goldschmidt, Arenado, Winn, Gorman.

    #238104
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I was under the impression that both the Guardians and the Blue Jays had some interest in O’Neill.

    #238115
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I don’t know mud. There have been so many click bait articles that are just somebody floating what they think is a potential trade matchup. I can’t remember if there is any meat to it or not.

    #238117
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    I think the Jays are seeking a LH power bat

    #238127
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    mudville said:

    And with this trade the Cardinals would be trading away, virtually, their whole system for three White Sox players.

    That is why this would be very unlikely to happen. Do we think Bill DeWitt is going to all of a sudden abandon his build from within model? I don’t think he will.

    #238128
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    LA said:

    I’m not excited about Cease, I’d much rather have Glasnow.

    Glasnow is the RH version of Snell. Electric stuff, high salary, and very likely to be on the IL.

    #238129
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    LA said:

    Adam Duvall usually signs for $5-7 million. He is a perfectly fine 4th outfielder.

    This I totally agree with.

    #238130
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    Do we think Bill DeWitt is going to all of a sudden abandon his build from within model? I don’t think he will.

    This is why I think it’s more realistic to target bullpen upgrades through trades than starting pitching.

    #238131
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Do we think Bill DeWitt is going to all of a sudden abandon his build from within model? I don’t think he will.

    The model just got us a 71-91 season, and a system that was most recently ranked a lot closer to the bottom than the top. But I agree, Bill still believes.

    As to the 7 prospect for Cease and Robert trade proposal, I doubt that is what the Sox are looking for. The fact that it is so many tells the tale. They will be looking for top shelf talent, not quantity of lesser quality. Winn and Hence are all we have on the MLB top 100 prospects list, so that will be the starter but will not be enough, especially with Winn’s wretched start at the plate. I doubt Walker could be a centerpiece because of defensive limitations. He is really only a 1B/DH for an org serious about fielding a quality team. Donovan is a super UT whatever we want to pretend. Putting together a trade to get Robert away from them, and Cease, will really clean us out of our young rostered players and top prospects. Other orgs could more readily put together a package.

    #238132
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I think ‘build from within’ refers to not trying to fulfill needs by signing {expensive} free agents.

    #238133
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I think so too mud, but the regime clearly stinks at it. Fulfilling needs includes both bringing up guys to fill needs and having guys to trade for what is needed. We desperatly need top end starters but have very little in the system. With Walker and Winn in the bigs and needed to fill out a team, the best we seem to have in the minors is a new guy who we know is worth a Monty rental. That gets us nowhere. The model has failed miserably. There is little choice to to pay cash in the FA market.

    #238197
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    There is a way to make the trade for Glasnow much more palatable – send back Steven Matz.

    Cardinals trade Graceffo + Matz to the Rays for Glasnow.

    Costs an incremental $13 million for the Cardinals, they still have $14 million left.

    #238200
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I don’t think the Rays would do that but they might take O’Neill back.

    Glasnow still makes me very nervous though. His innings pitched throughout his career are:

    2016- 23.1
    2017- 62.0
    2018- 111.2
    2019- 60.2
    2020- 57.1
    2021- 88.0
    2022- 6.2
    2023- 120.0

    He is not reliable.

    #238201
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Taking on Matz and his contract would be out of character for the Rays. They would want either a young player with a potentially very bright future, or a veteran with predictable production, like when they signed Charlie Morton.

    I’m not sure how much one year of Glasnow at $25M is worth in trade. I agree that a Glasnow trade is probably something the Cardinals could get done. That would give us 3 rotation members due for FA after 2024 and the other two after 2025.

    #238204
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    After taking a fresh look at those innings pitched numbers that gscottar posted, I think Glasnow has to be taken out of the conversation about pitching help for the Cardinals. Maybe, if the Rays would offer him for a low level prospect and be willing to take back $20M of the #25M that is owed him, would he be worth taking a chance on. The negotiations for Glasnow will likely be centered around how much of his $25M salary the acquiring ballclub will accept.

    #238255
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    With the Sonny Gray signing we now don’t have to worry about watching Glasnow or Snell sit on the IL. That is good news.

    #238303
    GameCard
    Participant

    Free

    Jon Morosi said this AM on Hot Stove that the Cardinals could trade with the Padres for Juan Soto. Trading O’Neill, Carlson & Liberatore.

    #238308
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    bling said:

    …I doubt Walker could be a centerpiece because of defensive limitations. He is really only a 1B/DH for an org serious about fielding a quality team…

    I am not quibbling with many of your comments, but I strongly disagree with this one. Your ongoing bias against Walker is not how the Cardinals (or most likely other teams) view him. I believe that because of his age, service time and upside that he would be the Cardinals’ MOST DESIRABLE trade chip (if he were to be made available, which he won’t be).

    Usually, fans overvalue their team’s prospects and players, but you seem to dislike them all (though some more than others).

    Of course, you are entitled to your opinions, even when they are off-base. 😉

Viewing 25 posts - 2,251 through 2,275 (of 2,445 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years