Former Cardinals in the News – 2017 to Aug. 2024 (closed)

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum Former Cardinals in the News – 2017 to Aug. 2024 (closed)

Viewing 25 posts - 2,351 through 2,375 (of 2,494 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #247112
    BrockLou
    Participant

    Free

    Regarding what they got for him in trade, they had no reason or motivation to take less than market value for him. Sadly, that seemed to be his value.

    I disagree on two points. First of all, I posted on this Open Forum, right after the O’Neill trade the view of the Boston press corps. They were shocked at how cheap they acquired Tyler.
    Second, once they decided to keep Olí another year, they became desperate to unload Tyler, and everyone in MLB knew it.
    Just because you are whistling past the graveyard doesn’t mean the ghosts and goblins aren’t out to get you, lol.

    #247113
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    We will have to agree to disagree on one point. Had another team offered more than Boston, the Cardinals would surely have taken it. Mo had announced publicly that O’Neill was available so it was no secret.

    My guess is that Bloom knew and likes the two they got in return. But that is just a guess.

    We do agree that the Cardinals hurt O’Neill’s value. And it isn’t the first time they’ve done that with a player.

    #247114
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    There’s no question that the Cardinal manager and his loose lips were the overiding factor that enabled the Red Sox to realize what they obviously feel was a tremendous bargain.

    #247117
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    A two week hot streak and people lose their minds. We have years of experience with O’Neill. We know perfectly well that what everyone has seen for these couple weeks is not what they are going to get. He has been hot before. Maybe it will be a little more this time because he wants to stick it to the Cardinals and he’s playing for a contract. But the chance of a Luke Voit year is minimal because he will not stay on the field. This and that will be bothering him. The homers will tail off. The rally killing strike outs will push him down in the lineup, he will not be able to stay on the field and will wear out his welcome, much, much faster than he did here.

    #247120
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    The Red Sox are banking that their minimal outlay will produce dividends something similar to O’Neill’s .286/34/80 and a GG season with the Cardinals, which is far beyond anything that Voit ever placed up on the board. Anyone who watched him in StL. for the first six years of his career knows it to be a genuine longshot, but the risk is near to nothing. If he scatters this week, the Red Sox aren’t any more worse for wear than when O’Neill arrived in Boston.

    #247133
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    1td said:

    The Red Sox are banking that their minimal outlay will produce dividends something similar to O’Neill’s .286/34/80 and a GG season with the Cardinals, which is far beyond anything that Voit ever placed up on the board.

    In just 56 games (because of the shortened COVID schedule) in 2020, Voit hit 22 home runs and drove in 52. That was an amazing pace. His .948 OPS was better than O’Neill’s career best. Then the clock struck midnight…

    What is your over/under on O’Neill playing in 56 games this entire season?

    (I peeked. In six seasons, he has averaged 79 games played or just under half a season. Only played over 100 once.)

    #247137
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    I’m cherry picking, but I don’t count ’20…No fans, no season. And if you want to compare numbers of games it’s 486/508 O’Neill/Voit. Both #’s are a 7 season total and in my view not enough of a difference to tip the balance on any reasonably accurate scale. As for the type of player, I’ll proclaim that the Red Sox are getting a much more talented and versatile player in O’Neill and they got him for a song. Over and under? I never make predictions, especially about the future, but he leads the AL in taters, runs scored, SLG and OPS…That means he’ll bust a tie rod end by Friday…Haha!

    #247142
    bicyclemike
    Moderator

    Paid - Annual

    After 2021 I thought O’Neill had turned the corner and predicted MVP candidacy for him in ‘22. Alas he regressed and the injury bug hit again. Then ‘23 was a disaster with more injuries and Ollie’s ill-advised comments to the press.

    Maybe this is the year he puts it all together. The potential has always been there with speed and power. Just has been too fragile.

    #247152
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    It is not cherry picking to exclude 2020. I should have done that. Excluding that year, O’Neiil’s average games played goes up from 78 to 85. Hooray!

    #247162
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    Haha…Well, that’s a little more than half a season!

    #247267
    BOCfan
    Participant

    Free

    Which hurt reliever did we get for Tyler O’Neill?

    #247271
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Which hurt reliever did we get for Tyler O’Neill?

    Victor Santos. At the time of the trade, in December, Santos had missed all of 2023 with elbow injury.

    #247273
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    right after the O’Neill trade the view of the Boston press corps. They were shocked at how cheap they acquired Tyler.

    It is said that the pros know you aren’t just trading the player, you are trading the contract. The Boston press corps obviously didn’t factor that in. The Sox were going to have to pay O’Neill’s 3rd year arb salary, estimated at the time $5.5M. So there wasn’t going to be anything substantial coming back. The only other way for the Cards to get out from under the $5.5M would have been non-tender him, in which case we would have got even less.

    #247418
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Maybe the Boston press was shocked (though I didn’t read it), but here is what the team’s manager told NESN (their BSM equivalent) weeks after the trade, during spring camp.

    “Manager Alex Cora told reporters this week at spring training that the Red Sox have a good idea of what the Opening Day lineup will look like. O’Neill isn’t projected to be one of Boston’s starting outfielders, but he and Rob Refsnyder will be relied upon in specific situations as the Red Sox hope to turn things around after two straight last-place finishes in the American League East.”

    https://nesn.com/2024/02/what-cardinals-exec-believes-red-sox-will-get-in-tyler-oneill/

    Like many, I hope O’Neill turns his career around, but suggesting it was a steal is not how the Red Sox saw it. In a minor trade between two last-place teams, the Sox got what they saw was a reserve outfielder.

    #247419
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    Is it fair to say we received three arms for O’Neill?

    Robertson and Santos as the trade package, and signing Middleton with O’Neills salary relief (2024 only).

    #247422
    stlcard25
    Participant

    I always had high hopes for O’Neill…very talented but streaky and couldn’t seem to stay healthy. We had that amazing run in 2021 but otherwise he was average or below as a player in St Louis. Hopefully he continues to do well in Boston. The Carda’ return for him is likely to be next to nothing, which isn’t atypical for a Mozeliak trade in these latter years.

    #247545
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Can’t wait to see how Boras tries to spin this. How about?

    “My company is so successful, we decided to cut back on the number of clients we represent.”

    #247546
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    Monty was also a FA with no team compensation attached to signing him. He signs one year deal after watching his best case play out, leading into free agency.

    #247547
    RBK
    Participant

    Hard to absolve Montgomery of responsibility in this: players hire Boras for a reason, usually when they believe they have unusual/peak leverage entering FA and want Boras’s particular approach to extracting the absolute maximum surplus from bidders. Of course, that a particular strategy may be optimal across a portfolio of clients is of little consolation to the client who doesn’t end up winning big.

    #247548
    bicyclemike
    Moderator

    Paid - Annual

    Sounds like Monty got some reasonable offers, but Boras advised him to hold out thinking the mega-deal would be forthcoming. It never happened and he signed what is really about the worst type of deal he could do – one year at a not overly high rate. It is unlikely he will increase his value much as he will be another year older, plus there is always the injury risk.

    I think he probably had offers similar to Sonny Gray’s deal, but Boras can be greedy. There is a principal in finance that goes, “never make financial decisions based on greed or fear.” I think that may be a Warren Buffet quote but am not sure of the source.

    #247552
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Maybe he waited too long and the owners ran out of money.

    #247554
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    Well, it didn’t take a baseball whiz-kid to easily envision that Tyler O’Neill’s bat would quickly backslide to it’s typically unproductive nature. He didn’t rip a HR yesterday…

    #247561
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    No, they just converted the cash to dry powder.

    #247573
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #248041
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    His 8th team in the last seven years and 11 seasons total.

Viewing 25 posts - 2,351 through 2,375 (of 2,494 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years