2024 Rotation

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum 2024 Rotation

Viewing 25 posts - 176 through 200 (of 852 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #234445
    bccran
    Participant

    I may be wrong, but it seems like top pitchers from high level D-1 college programs normally
    don’t stay at “low” A ball their entire 1st full season. Especially if they’re doing really well and pretty much dominating. They either start at high A or are promoted from A if doing well. Examples are Hudson and Hjerpe. Just a thought.

    #234554
    PadsFS
    Participant

    osuagec

    Anyone else notice Liberatore’s September so far. 6 relief appearances, 8 innings, 2 hits, 0 runs, 8 strikeouts and 3 walks.
    I know, small sample size, but has he found a home in the bullpen for 2024?

    Liberatore has always pitched well when his fastball velocity is up. Coming out of the bullpen is probably his best spot. I don’t mind him or Thompson doing so, or either of them shooting for the 5th spot and going to the bullpen if it doesn’t happen.

    I’d like for Mozeliak to add a guy like Mahle or Montas, as a 4th SP option. Then, they can bring him along slowly, coming back from injury with these two (Liberatore and Thompson) fighting for the early April starts.

    #234966
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Alcantara won the Cy, signed a 5/55 contract which bought out two arb years, then turned in a good but not eye popping season which ended a bit early due to UCL trouble. He tried rest, and a rehab stint which produced contining forearm pain so he shut down earlier this month. Now they decide what the path forward is, surgery or try rest and rehab again. Mo will be watching, and Bill. The Fish spent the money but might not have a starter to show for it. Now they may well need a plan B for that rotation slot in 2024. What does their laundry list look like? Mo and Bill seeing their life flashing by before their eyes.

    #235032
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Are you suggesting the Marlins are going to outbid or out trade the Cardinals for pitching? The latter might be true but I doubt the former will be considering the Marlins very frugal payroll.

    #235041
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    No, not that gscottar. I think the Cards org believes the team absolutely must be competative next year, and no ifs, and or buts, will work if they are not. The Marlin’s/Alcantara was given as an example of the proposition that even if we add 3 good starters, it doesn’t mean we will have three good starters. It means we will have anywhere from 3 to none. So that example illustrates the reality that adding the 3 that we need is not enough. Not if we must contend and not if what is behind them is inadequate to carry us through whatever attrition we encounter.

    My sense of things is that the Cardinals will take on a pitcher contract that exceeds Leake’s 5/80, but will not take on two such contracts. In my mind that sets the upper limit as to the quality we can expect at the top end of the pitching staff rebuild. I really don’t have any idea what to expect beyond that as to quality and quantity. Do we get three guys better than Mikolas? Two, or just one? There is depth to be acquired and then there is the pen, which is horrible all up and down. We have gotten used to ninth inning guys who routinely turn it into a cluster and then wiggle out of it half the time or therabouts. If they wiggle out a bit more than that for a spell we think we’re rolling in it. But you don’t win like that. We need an actual closer who can regulrly limit ninth inning traffic. We need a couple guys behind that who can be counted on to come in and not walk guys, hit guys, throw it to the screen or over the first baseman’s head. We need it all this winter, and just because you spend some money to plug a hole doesn’t mean its plugged. That is what life with a shitty roster and no help in the system is like.

    #235052
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I don’t see a last place finish for the Cardinals in 2023 because I think the pitching can only be ‘improved’, not brought up to being capable of going deep into the playoffs. But that’s about it. Top of rotation starters are just not out there to be acquired. Hence, Roby, Hjerpe, Robberse, Bedell should be ready to contribute at some point in 2025.

    #235135
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    It seems real possible there will be no homegrowns in the rotation next year, depending upon whether Matz is in or out. Given his contract, I think he will be in. That is really a drastic turn of events from past years.

    The pen seems likely to have little homegrown influence either. As to true relievers, Helsley seems likely to still be here, but that could be it. Besides that, a couple laundry list starter wannabes, probably Liberatore and Thompson if they survive the winter, might be in the pen. Or one in the pen and one stretched out at Memphis. That’s about it as far as the system’s contribution to the ML pitching staff. Attrition will happen, but Mo already has brought it some outside guys along those lines, and probably more will arrive this winter. Its a total disgrace and failure. I know some cling to the notion the system isn’t as bad as all that, but at least on the pitching side it is. I know we are hopeful about some pitchers further away, and I hope so, but we must remember that they are coming up in the same system, so a different result would be unexpected.

    It will be real interesting to see what happens in the organization this winter.

    #235143
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    I have mentioned this frequently in recent years. The Cards went hitter heavy in a number of drafts. That led to the Carlsons and Gormans, Walkers and Winns, but fewer top picks were used on pitchers. And the pitchers they drafted early, other than Thompson perhaps, haven’t panned out.

    They swung back toward pitching in the 2022 and 2023 drafts, but those guys aren’t ready yet.

    I track national top 100 prospect lists every spring. Over the last decade, here are the number of Cardinals to appear on any of the lists I track. See how the split between pitchers and hitters changed.

    P.S. And the sole pitcher on the lists in 2020, 2021 and 2022 was a trade acquisition (Liberatore), not an original Cardinal.

    This pitching gap has been a long time coming, and without spending a lot of assets (money for free agents or players in trade that will hurt the offense and prospect pipeline), it isn’t going to be fixed instantly.

    Top 100 Pitchers Hitters
    2014 3 3
    2015 3 1
    2016 3 0
    2017 4 3
    2018 2 5
    2019 2 4
    2020 1 3
    2021 1 4
    2022 1 3
    2023 4 4
    #235414
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    As of now, the only thing we know about the 2024 rotation is that Mikolas will be in it, so lets think about that for a minute.

    Miles got extended through 2025, and thanks, I believe, to a front loaded structure he gets $16M per for 24 and 25. I note that his last appearance in 2022 was 3 innings and 1 ER in relief (getting him over 200 IP) at the end of the season, so I exclude that.

    2022: 31 starts, 199 IP, 6.4 innings per start. 3.29 ERA, 7.6 H/9, 1.033 WHIP. SO% 19%, BAA .226
    2023: 35 starts, 201 IP, 5.75 innings per start. 4.78 ERA, 10.1 H/9, 1.316 WHIP. SO% 15.9%, BAA .282

    I did compare Montgomery’s stats from the two years, even though he switched teams at the deadline both years. Some went up and some down, but no slide at all.

    So Miles had a down year. Blame whoever and whatever you want, but it didn’t affect Montgomery. We can hope he has a better age 35 season than his age 34 season was. There will be some hoping for that. To get to the point, he got hit around, and likely due to that, he didn’t go as deep into games. But he led the league in answering the bell, which on our 2023 team qualifies him for a smiley face sticker on his locker. I don’t know what his avg fastball speed was or anything, I’m just looking at results.

    He is probably not going to be the #5, more likely #3 or 4. His 2023 numbers would make him a good reliable innings eater toward the bottom of the rotation. But I hope we have 3 better guys. I hope we have 4 better guys. We also need to accept that he is at an age where a starter can flame out pretty quick, so we could be looking at that for two years. Hopefully not.

    #235428
    PadsFS
    Participant

    Brian Walton

    And the pitchers they drafted early, other than Thompson perhaps, haven’t panned out.

    This is the biggest culprit, plus using the trades to land hitters or pitchers that are gone soon after (Lester, Quintana)

    2013 – Gonzales – traded
    2014 – Weaver – traded
    2015 – Woodford (bust)
    2016 – Hudson, Gallen (traded)
    2017 – lost picks
    2018 – Griffin Roberts (bust)
    2019 – Zack Thompson, Andre Pallante

    Then our international signees looked like this:
    2010 – Martinez – Great pickup
    2012 – Reyes (bust)
    2013 – Alcantara – traded
    2014 – Fernandez (bust)
    2015 – Seijas (bust)
    2016 – Oviedo – traded

    So maybe 1 rotation spot out of all of this between Martinez (15-18), Hudson (19-22), and Hudson/Thompson (23)

    #235438
    ZTR
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Mikolas is what he is. A 10-12 win guy with an ERA of 4.5 to 5.5 with lots of traffic on the base paths.

    If he’s counted on to be higher than the #4 or #5 guy in the rotation next year then it’s going to be a problem.

    #235439
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Mikolas will make $16M and Matz $12.5 each of the next 2 years. If they could both be moved, Mo could redeploy that payroll to afford anybody on the FA market without hitting BDW up for any new money until beyond 2025.

    #235440
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    If we look back and agree we did acquire three starters better than Mikolas, what a successful winter that will have been.

    Mikolas base runners in 2023 ware league avg ( mlb 1.315 WHIP vs 1.316 ), but it did seem high traffic for him, coming off an all-star season.

    #235441
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Agreed. But for the record I would rather have the starter of our dreams that Mikolas and Matz.

    #235443
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    If the two pitchers aren’t worth their salaries to remain Cardinals, why would they be a value to another team? The cost of a win is the cost of a win…

    #235448
    bccran
    Participant

    Mo picked up 4 pitchers in July who may be a year away from being ready.
    He also has younger guys like Thompson, McGreevy, Graceffo, and Hence to consider. I just wonder if he’s going to concentrate on the trade market this winter, looking at guys who’re in their arbitration years. Give him some contract flexibility to see which cream rises to the top.

    #235449
    bccran
    Participant

    Mo traded in July for 4 starters who are only a year away from being ready. He also has younger guys like Thompson, McGreevy, Graceffo, and Hence in the mix. Maybe he’ll make several trades for arbitration years guys and see what cream rises to the top. Keeps his flexibility that way. Extend the guys who perform.

    #235464
    CariocaCardinal
    Participant

    Free

    Tremor Baur anyone?

    #235465
    forsch31
    Participant

    Free

    You could probably get Bauer for a small base salary and some major incentives for innings pitched.

    #235466
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Somebody will sign him.

    #235469
    ZTR
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    From what I’ve read poor guy got absolutely jobbed during a time when our country and general society lost their collective minds for about 3-4 years.

    I hope he is able to resume his career and, if what I’ve read is even remotely true, then I also hope he is able to recover the millions he lost plus punitive relief from the news outlets and any false accuser through our court system.

    #235472
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    It doesn’t seem necessary, for our purposes, to decide if he was treated fairly or not, nor whether he is a good person. The justice system played out and he came out pretty clean, so his career will probably pick back up.

    #235490
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    The Dodgers paid Bauer $26M not to play in 2023. Unless they just like printing money for the fun of it they must have had a reason.

    #235502
    Nathan Leopold Jr.
    Participant

    Free

    I think we can scratch Sonny Gray off our shopping list.

    #235505
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Gray will be 34 next month and will probably want 4-5 years. He could be great next year, but whoever signs him will get some downhill, just a question of how much.

Viewing 25 posts - 176 through 200 (of 852 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years