- This topic has 559 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
56 Shane Billings – Has not shown power but speedy center fielder who hits well.
57 Derian Gonzalez – Will probably be the most underrated player in this process
58 Ramon Santos – Dominant in starts during August. 2 earned runs in last 6 starts.
59 Trey Nielson – Strong AAA performance. Health a question
60 Andrew Morales – Solid performance in relief. Should get betterWow, Chris Ellis (25) and Trey Neilson (26) both demoted from Memphis to Springfield getting love as legitimate prospects. Ellis has never been that good or had any command. Neilson took his ball and headed home on a temporary leave and never came back. My guess is that he leaves as a minor league free agent.
Anyway, my picks are:
56. Kruczynski
57. Ivan Herrera
58. Freddy De Jesus
59. Andrew Summerville
60. Austin WarnerEllis can re-invent himself next year as a reliever, going with just his fastball and slider. I don’t really know why they kept him as a starter most of the year anyway. It was pretty clear to me that he wasn’t going to make it after his Memphis stint.
I forgot about Arturo Reyes, but he actually pitched worse as a reliever this year. I don’t know that I’ve seen that before, especially from a guy that should be pretty good in relief.
56. Joshua Lopez (A catcher who is also a consistent hitter with a .773 OPS)
57. Nogowski (At Springfield in 61 games, he managed a .295 BA with 21 RBI’s and a .760 OPS. He is a pretty good contact guy that maybe the organization feels could become a big bat with development. He was chosen as AFL taxi player candidate, which says to me that the organization must see something there. He’s played outfield so far at AFL..so maybe they see some potential as an outfielder.)
58. Evan Kruczynski
59. In McKinney
60. Arthuro Reyes
Reyes did have a bad stretch after his months long injury but he’s been solid in the AFL this fall. He was also pitching well before the injury.
I’m going to close it for #56-60.
#56 – Andrew Morales
#57 – Evan Kruczynski
#58 – Derian Gonzalez
#59 – Ian McKinney
#60 – Didn’t have enough votes I don’t think, just 9 for Nicacio and Ortega with two votes each.Is everyone ok with carrying #60 over into the next round?
I’m fine with it Pads.
60. Ivan Herrera
61. Freddy Dejesus
62. Austin Warner
63. Andrew Summerville
64. Josh Lopez
65. Daniel CastanoPads can you share your entire vote total? My talley isn’t matching yours…
Kruczynski – 20
Morales – 17
Gonzalez – 14
McKinney – 14
Lopez – 11
Nicasio – 9
Ortega – 9
Reyes – 7
Billings – 6
Castano – 6
Summerville – 6
Godoy – 5
Nielsen – 5
Santos – 4
Herrera – 4
Nogowski – 4
DeJesus – 3
Jenner – 3
Guillory – 2
Warner – 1Good catch BHC. I missed Cards1776 votes. With that, I’ll change the vote some:
#56 – Evan Kruczynski
#57 – Andrew Morales
#58 – Derian Gonzalez
#59 – Ian McKinneyLooks like Kruczynski and Morales switching was the only change.
Also, I was under the impression that VegasJim and CC were voting for Caleb Lopez, not Joshua Lopez. If all the Lopez votes are for Josh, then he can be our 60th prospect with his 11 votes.
Okay, then we will make Joshua Lopez the #60 prospect.
Wiley – Do you want to just shift your votes down and remove Lopez from spot #64?
Sooner, I think you mean Leandro Cedeno.
CC, I think you mean Shane Billings.
We don’t want to confuse Pads…..wink…wink
I still have 6 guys that fit into the 51-60 range. So far, of the 60 prospects already selected there are 8 that didn’t come up on my radar screen for top-60 and 7 for my top-70.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.