The Cardinal Nation’s 2024 Top 50 Prospect Countdown

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum The Cardinal Nation’s 2024 Top 50 Prospect Countdown

Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 168 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #240432
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    We have a lot of experience with pitchers we’re excited about looking less exciting in AAA. I want to see if he’s better than what we’ve got. If he is, that will be great, but I also think the BJs FO knows what they are doing.

    #240433
    stlcard25
    Participant

    Maybe I’m just going through an overly pessimistic phase, but I’m starting to agree more with bling on the prospects and the direction of the team. Robberse has a little promise, but also has some red flags and we’ve seen plenty of this type not end up helping the big league team. Hopefully he finds a way to contribute in St Louis over the next couple of years, and there will very likely be work if he’s willing to put in the effort and achieve the results needed.

    #240436
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #240437
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    I think it is also fair without criticizing anyone to remind folks that Robberse + Kloffenstein were the return for two months of Jordan Hicks’ services. Not two years, two months.

    #240438
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Yes, two months. And as I said, the BJs FO knows what they are doing. They probably didn’t trade the next Zac Galen.

    I’m interested to see how those guys do in AAA compared to McGreevy, Graceffo.

    #240444
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    So far, our rankings favor the two returnees over the two newcomers, but there could be some familiarity bias. On the other hand, newcomer Roby is very competitive with incumbent Hence as the top pitching prospect in the system.

    #240452
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #240453
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    newcomer Roby is very competitive with incumbent Hence as the top pitching prospect in the system.

    Yes, they are exciting prospects. With them, it’s going to be about who can stay off the IL.

    #240454
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    So far, our rankings favor the two returnees over the two newcomers

    The community has it like that, with Herpe below the returning guys and ahead of the new guys.

    #240502
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #240536
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Yep, TCN has them in the same order as the Community. Bernal, Crooks, Pages. An old retired baseball guy I knew when I was young used to say the thing about catchers is, the farther away they are, the better they look. It was true then and its true now.

    #240538
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    Although I just now became aware that he even existed in the Redbird system, I really like this Jimmy Crooks guy. I’d say he has a very good chance to cement his place in Cardinal lore right beside Tommy Lawless…

    #240544
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I would caution against getting googly eyes over a catcher in A ball, but it wouldn’t do any good.

    #240546
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    I’ll wait’ll I see his bat flip before passing final judgement.

    #240554
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #240566
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Skipping back a few slots, how concerned should we be about Chase Davis? First off, there is the fact that he was drafted at all, when the narratve of the day has the draft focus turned toward pitching. And the importance of a hit with our only pick before the 3rd round.

    And then there is his performance at the plate. It stunk. A slightly deeper look showed the he didn’t hit lefties even more than he didn’t hit righties, by a considerable margin. And his by the month splits shows he got worse as his season progressed rather than better. So in summary, Yikes!

    This is a college hitter from a decent baseball program drafted in the first round who was manhandled by low A pitching over 131 PAs. It seems very concerning to me.

    #240598
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    MLB Pipeline has Davis the number three prospect in the system after only Winn and Hence. So they surely are not concerned. 😉

    My personal ranking has him no. 16.

    #240602
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Or, they are concerned about everyone else even more. 🙁

    #240617
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #240622
    14NyquisT
    Participant

    If the Cards draft someone like Davis this year with the 7th selection….. big mistake. We’ll see what happens… so we just have to keep our fingers crossed that our Draft Dept doesn’t add another stinker to their list. I’m not totally down on Davis but a bit concerned so far.

    #240631
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    They used to tell the young hitters coming into pro ball the difference is now you face somebody’s Friday night starter every day. I’d be afraid to find out what they tell them now.

    My guess is Davis didn’t do well against the Friday night types but was adept at feasting on the rotation filler guys who are selling insurance now. A college hitter can put up big numbers like that. Big glorious numbers that have the computer lit like a christmas tree.

    #240635
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Assuming numbers are how players are drafted is not real, ignoring the important role amateur scouts play. But when you distrust numbers, it is the cause of all ills. Gotta have something to blame…

    #240636
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Whether it is an MLB season or a pro debut, if results are bad, then yes, something is to blame. You dismis my idea, as if it could not possibly be correct, but do not offer anything else.

    #240637
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    The player had a rough first partial season. Though there are many possible theories and combinations of them, no one knows why. That includes both me and you.

    What I dismissed is the apparent lack of understanding of what goes into how players are drafted. That is not specific to any individual.

    #240639
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I’m not too worried about Chase Davis. 135 plate appearances isn’t much to go on. In that small sample he ran a really good OBP but didn’t hit for much power and had a fairly low batting average. Is any of that a good predictor of future performance? Probably not. And does any of that indicate that the computers picked him and that the computers are always wrong? Almost certainly not.

Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 168 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years