Home › The Cardinal Nation Forums › Open Forum › Giancarlo Stanton thread
- This topic has 620 replies, 37 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by
gscottar.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 30, 2017 at 11:19 pm #38451
Ken Rosenthal asked me to not close this thread! 😉
Meeting between #SFGiants and Stanton’s reps does NOT necessarily indicate deal is close, not when Stanton has full veto power. SF execs simply might want to feel out situation, as @Buster_ESPN said. SFG also might pivot if it senses Stanton will say no, as @hankschulman said.
December 1, 2017 at 12:01 am #38454I wonder if it could be that maybe the Marlins front office likes the Giants deal but Stanton doesn’t or something like that…
December 1, 2017 at 7:25 am #38455From Peter Gammons:
As of late Thursday, Marlins pro scouting dept. only asked for reports on 2 organizations’ prospects:Giants, Cardinals. period
December 1, 2017 at 7:38 am #38458I don’t think this is over yet but if the Cards refuse to beat that Giants “offer” or they don’t want to take on that much Salary the fans are going to lose their minds once again and really the Front office is going to deserve everything they get.
Because while there are rumors he may not want to play here or there nothing has been said for a fact that he doesn’t and if he wants to win the giants right now are NOT the place to be it will be another rebuilding year for them as the 4th best team in their own division.
December 1, 2017 at 8:47 am #38461I guess we will see if they are still alive but it sure send like they have fallen short whatever the reasons may be in the end. The other Marlins outfielders don’t move the needle for me. Good players no doubt but not the star we need like Stanton is.
December 1, 2017 at 8:54 am #38462Agree TexasC the other marlin outfielders are not game changers for the Cards that they need…but lets be honest if the Cards miss out would anybody here be shocked that the front office finished 2nd, as we all know that is what they are best at.
December 1, 2017 at 9:48 am #38471There is another possibility, however remote, and that is that the Cardinals were on the approved list and don’t need to convince Stanton to come here!!!
But realistically, it would seem DeWitt is sticking by his comments made this summer that he doesn’t want to take on contracts that can turn into an albatross and was probably trying to get Miami to pay half the deal.
December 1, 2017 at 10:01 am #38474The marlins could simply be exhausting all options with a deadline coming soon.
December 1, 2017 at 11:37 am #38483There is no deadline. Stanton can string this along as long as he wants to.
December 1, 2017 at 11:40 am #38484Stanton in St. Louis is at best a dream.
It’s not realistic to expect the Cardinals to acquire a player the caliber of Stanton.
Even if he agreed to come here, there are other teams that would give up more talent or take on all of his salary.
December 1, 2017 at 12:19 pm #38492PadsFS
ParticipantOne thing that sticks in my mind was this throwaway comment from a fangraphs fantasy article:
With that said, there’s no one primed for more regression than Stanton. His percentage of batted balls of 95 mph or greater from 2015 to 2017, chronologically: 52.9%, 48.7%, 45.5%. Average EV: 95.9 mph, 93.9 mph, 91.9 mph. History tells us he’ll regress. Based on the metrics, I don’t trust his barrel frequency either.
December 1, 2017 at 12:43 pm #38493Lowest % of barreled balls, lowest EV, highest home runs…
What does the launch angle tell you?
December 1, 2017 at 1:27 pm #38494I think it was Jim Bowden that gave another opinion about the Stanton deal. He believes the Cardinals offered the best deal to the Marlins but he thinks the Marlins feel they are more likely to get him to say yes to being traded to the Giants.
December 1, 2017 at 1:40 pm #38496There is most likely a deadline — from the cardinals.
Which was why I said that.
December 1, 2017 at 1:45 pm #38499The #SFGiants say their meeting with Giancarlo Stanton reps were simply precursor in trade talks with #Marlins. They still don't know whether deal can be consummated
— Bob Nightengale (@BNightengale) December 1, 2017
“The #SFGiants say their meeting with Giancarlo Stanton reps were simply precursor in trade talks with #Marlins. They still don’t know whether deal can be consummated”
December 1, 2017 at 1:46 pm #38500For Giancarlo Stanton to move from the Marlins to a California team, there would be a major state tax increase. Some agents estimate it could cost Stanton in range of $25m-$27.5m over course of his 10-year deal. Marlins/trade partner could endeavor to offset this.
— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) December 1, 2017
“For Giancarlo Stanton to move from the Marlins to a California team, there would be a major state tax increase. Some agents estimate it could cost Stanton in range of $25m-$27.5m over course of his 10-year deal. Marlins/trade partner could endeavor to offset this.”
December 1, 2017 at 7:04 pm #38507Jon Morosi reporting on twitter:
Sources: #STLCards officials have a meeting with Giancarlo Stanton today in Los Angeles. @MLB @MLBNetworkDecember 1, 2017 at 7:38 pm #38508More Morosi:
To clarify, I am told the #STLCards meeting is with Giancarlo Stanton’s representatives — not necessarily Stanton himself.
December 1, 2017 at 7:42 pm #38510Least they are getting a chance to give their pitch
December 1, 2017 at 7:42 pm #38511Well I give them credit for getting in the door. It’s really on him at this point. Give the best sales job you can. Hoping for the best.
December 1, 2017 at 7:53 pm #38512Cal state tax rate = 13.3%
Mo state tax rate = 6.0%
FL state tax rate = noneMap of all states here: https://twitter.com/SportsTaxMan/status/936609649230536705
What that means in cash via Bob Nightengale:
Under the current tax law, If Giancarlo Stanton is traded to the #SFGiants and becomes a California resident, it will cost him $19.9 million in additional income taxes, per @SportsTaxMan
December 1, 2017 at 7:55 pm #38513Florida has a wealth tax that neither CA or MO has.
Ok the wealth tax no.longer exists but I cant figure out how to delete my post!
December 1, 2017 at 7:57 pm #38514Morosi seems really plugged into this situation…
If Giancarlo Stanton agrees to be dealt to #SFGiants or #STLCards, sources believe trade could be finalized within the next several days; if he says no — and holds out for #Dodgers — timeline is less certain.
https://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/936758675913494528
Then again, Nightengale seems to disagree, mentioning other “teams” not “team”.
There is no timetable set for Giancarlo Stanton to decide on #SFGiants. The Giants understand there are other teams he will consider before he decides whether to waive his full no-trade clause. #Stlcards
December 1, 2017 at 8:15 pm #38517At this point though no one truly believes the Dodgers are even interested, just keeping tabs because of the Giants. The Dodgers do have a lot of money but the tax they would be paying would be too much for even them.
December 1, 2017 at 9:28 pm #38534I posted in the wrong thread
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
