Cards sign C Willson Contreras

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum Cards sign C Willson Contreras

Viewing 14 posts - 126 through 139 (of 139 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #208868
    Bob Reed
    Participant

    Free

    “Who were the Cardinals planning on having as a closer if they traded away Helsley?”

    Well, they still have Giovanny Gallegos under contract for two more years, and he’s been as effective as Bruce Sutter or Lee Smith so far in his Cardinal career.

    Sutter with Cards: 132 ERA+, 397 IP, 6.3 WAR
    Big Lee with Cards: 128 ERA+, 267 IP, 4.4 WAR
    Gallegos thus far: 142 ERA+, 230 IP, 4.1 WAR

    Okay, I take it back, kind of. Bruce did give an incredible volume of innings. But again, in terms of effectiveness, Gallegos is right there with the Hall Of Famers. He gets out both righty and lefty batters (career OPS allowed of .559 and .611, respectively), and he pitches well on zero days rest, with a career .610 OPS and an unfathomable 52-to-4 K/BB ratio. Cleanup hitters have a .532 OPS against him, so he does dandy against even the best batters. He would be fine as the regular 9th inning guy, I think.

    All of that said, I don’t believe I’d make that trade for Danny Ouchie Jansen. The Redbird pitching is mediocre as is, so why water it down? Heck, I wouldn’t have released Alex Reyes, frustrating though he is. Just forty good innings would be worth a few million bucks.

    #209840
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #209844
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    That was a fun article to read. We have been blessed with some great catchers.

    Also had a three year run with Tony Pena (unfortunate Van Slyke trade) and who can forget Glenn Brummer stealing home…lol

    #209864
    1982 willie
    Participant

    Too bad Contreras doesn’t really fit the cardinal mold but hopefully he does well now that he is here.

    #209865
    1982 willie
    Participant

    Gallegos should never be mentioned in the same sentence as Sutter ever. Sutter was never afraid of the moment. Not saying he didn’t blow games cause every pitcher has. But gallegos, if an egg shell cracked at the wrong time when he was pitching, I’m not sure where the ball would go or what he would do. Totally goes into Barney Fife mode in the biggest moments. He’s a solid pitcher but that’s it.

    #209866
    Euro Dandy
    Participant

    Free

    Gallegos should never be mentioned in the same sentence as Sutter ever.

    This sentence is disgusted with itself. 🙂

    Oxymoron aside, I agree with Willie. When Sutter came in games as early as the 7th, I felt like the game was in the bag. With Gallegos, I sweat. Maybe a lot of that is because I’m older with a different view, but also some of it is Gallegos doesn’t exude confidence when he takes so much time. Will interesting to see how the pitch clock affect him. I think it might help him to get on with it and not overthink.

    #209983
    bccran
    Participant

    Gallegos is like Izzy. He can be a thrill a minute.

    #209992
    Bob Reed
    Participant

    Free

    Below are the career and numerous situational statistics, i.e., “clutch splits,” for Bruce Sutter and Giovanny Gallegos. These numbers are not intended to persuade anyone of anything, but rather to merely inform and if possible very mildly entertain.

    Overall Career OPS Allowed: Sutter .628, Gallegos .582
    September Only: Sutter .701, Gallegos .637
    Two Outs: Sutter .579, Gallegos .607
    Men On Base: Sutter .631, Gallegos .660
    R.I.S.P.: Sutter .661, Gallegos .702
    2 Outs, R.I.S.P.: Sutter .605, Gallegos .623
    Late & Close: Sutter .630, Gallegos .595
    Tied Score: Sutter .647, Gallegos .508
    High Leverage: Sutter .659, Gallegos .647
    Medium Leverage: Sutter .571, Gallegos .499
    Low Leverage: Sutter .610, Gallegos .582
    9th Inning: Sutter .634, Gallegos .607
    Extras: Sutter .695, Gallegos .968 (20 at-bats)

    #209993
    Euro Dandy
    Participant

    Free

    Ah, so it’s extra inning performance that will keep Gio out of the HOF?

    Sorry, Bob, I’m tossing out that comment only to mildly entertain. 🙂 Interesting numbers.

    #209998
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I don’t believe the Cards had any actual willingness to trade Helsley. Just winter meetings media spew.

    #210002
    ZTR
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    ‘Media spew’, lol. Is that a BB trademarked original or did you see that turn of phrase somewhere?

    #210011
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Gallegos will have an interesting time dealing with the pitch clock.

    #210014
    14NyquisT
    Participant

    Contreras should be able to greatly exceed the mess that was the Cards catching spot in the order last season. I know this has already gone over and over but IMO he will start over 100 games behind the plate and x amount as DH. Its something that we haven’t had in a couple of years as Molina was breaking down and refusing to sit game after game. For me I have a very positive feeling about Contreras and I can hardly wait for spring training to start up in less than two months to see if I’m correct about him.

    #210145
    bicyclemike
    Moderator

    Paid - Annual

    On the Sutter/Gallegos thing, we tend to be much more concerned over recent failures than those of the past.

    Most every stat shows Gallegos comparable to Sutter. The biggest difference is Bruce did it over 1000 innings, whereas Gio has only thrown 260. If Gio can maintain the pace he is on for another 750 innings or so, then we can make a fair comparison to Sutter.

Viewing 14 posts - 126 through 139 (of 139 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years