Baseball America Cardinals prospect rankings

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum Baseball America Cardinals prospect rankings

Viewing 25 posts - 251 through 275 (of 351 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #284234
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I would have McGreevy at 3 with Saggase at Davis’s 8 spot and Davis out of the top 8 with Bernal in the top 10.

    https://www.baseballamerica.com/teams/2020-st-louis-cardinals/prospects/

    #284288
    858booyah
    Participant

    Free

    What is going on with Chen-Wei Lin? I went to a Peoria game earlier in late April and I didn’t know what his story was but it appears he’s an interesting prospect on a team possibly lacking one.

    #284305
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Booyah,

    Lin is a very exciting pitcher that has mid rotation upside. The Cards signed him in 23 out of Taiwan. He is a giant at 6’7″, but he has plenty of room to fill out still. Despite being so lanky with room to fill in, he consistently sits 94-97 with his fastball and easily is able to ramp it up to 99 and 100. Fangraphs has his fastball as a 70 grade pitch and BA has it at 60. For someone his height, it isn’t unexpected that Lin has some consistency problems in his delivery, but I expect that to get better and better with more innings. He needs to continue to improve his breaking pitches as well, but the changeup projects to be a 60 grade to give him 2 plus pitches.

    #284320
    858booyah
    Participant

    Free

    I see Lin has only 5 games pitched and only 16 innings. I did see he was put on rehab assignment. Was he injured in the spring?

    He’s 23 now in high A. So one would think if he had mid rotation upside. He’d likely need to advance soon to test that upside.

    #284345
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Yes Lin got hurt in spring training and missed the first few weeks. Lin is an interesting case in that he signed as an IAFA at 21 year old and is still kind of raw so he is older, but in terms of experience the level makes sense. I expected him to get through A+ quickly though and spend a couple of months at AA, but that likely isn’t the case anymore with the injury.

    #287479
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #287853
    Cardinals27
    Participant

    Free

    BA has 5 new draftees in the top 30. And as many at TCN predicted, Doyle is number 2.

    #287904
    14NyquisT
    Participant

    C-27 What are the others?

    #287907
    Cardinals27
    Participant

    Free

    Mitchel at 8, Gurevich at 19, Franklin at 24, and Crossland at 25.

    #288739
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    BA’s post draft top 100 list has Wetherholt at #10 and then Doyle at #68.

    https://www.baseballamerica.com/rankings/2025-top-100-prospects/

    #290385
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    BA has a new top 100 up. Wetherholt is up to #5 overall. Doyle at# #66.

    https://www.baseballamerica.com/rankings/2025-top-100-prospects/

    Some interesting comments about Wetherholt from an article on BA as well. I’m not too concerned with him trading some contact for power as the in game results have only benefited and he isn’t striking out at high rates while his excellent plate discipline and ability to foul pitches off lets him draw a lot of walks.

    BA

    We took a brief look at Wetherholt a couple of weeks ago and noted his new-found power and slightly surprising contact numbers, given the scouting profile. This warrants the question: Is Wetherholt now a power-over-hit type of player? Let’s go back to A-ball last year:

    Early last year, after he was drafted, Wetherholt showed he was hitting the ball hard, with roughly 60-grade power. But he also had a below-average zone contact rate. Let’s compare that to what we’ve seen in Triple-A so far this season:

    The metrics strongly suggest Wetherholt is sacrificing some bat-to-ball to swing harder and try to do more damage. His chase rates are elite—bordering on impeccable—with tremendous bat-to-ball when he does chase. This reads like a player who uses his “A” swing when he targets a pitch in the zone and his “B” swing to fight off pitches that he gets fooled on.

    The impression coming out of the draft was that Wetherholt was a contact-oriented hitter. That may no longer be true.

    #292635
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    BA grades the Cardinals system at “B” for their 2025 season. It was the third best score in the division.

    Cubs B-
    Reds C+
    Brewers A+
    Pirates A

    https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/mlb-farm-system-grades-for-every-team-in-2025/

    #295687
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    BA released their top 10 rankings for the Cardinals prospects. They had quite a shake up from some of their earlier rankings with Tanner Franklin seeing a big jump.

    1. JJ Wetherholt – summary is they think potential star
    2. Liam Doyle
    3. Rainiel Rodriguez
    4. Joshua Baez
    5. Quinn Mathews
    6. Tanner Franklin
    7. Ixan Henderson
    8. Jimmy Crooks
    9. Leonardo Bernal
    10. Yairo Padilla

    https://www.baseballamerica.com/teams/2020-st-louis-cardinals/prospects/?season=2026&ranking=preseason

    #295688
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I think BA has undermined their own credibility with this ridiculous ranking. After seeing this, I wouldn’t quote them on anything, and wouldn’t trust anything they say.

    #295689
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    Tanner Franklin by year:

    2023: 8.18 ERA in 11.0 IP @ Kennesaw
    2024: 5.60 ERA in 27.1 IP @ Kennesaw
    2025: 4.89 ERA in 38.2 IP @ Tennessee

    He has two pitches.

    I could understand the hype over Ben Joyce when he came out. I cannot understand it for Tanner Franklin.

    #295690
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    At least they gave up on the gimpy arm crowd. Their list isn’t hugely different than ours so far, except Franklin, and its not like the guys they are putting him ahead of are rock stars.

    #295692
    CardsFanInChiTown
    Participant

    Free

    I agree with all of you 100%, Franklin and Padilla have zero results to even consider being on this list.
    Baez at 4 is well deserved which is why I hope they get a 1 year RF or LF to bridge the gap until he’s ready.

    Secondly, Crooks over Bernal is far from correct, his numbers in Springfield at his age, at catcher, deserve as much respect as Baez IMHO.

    #295713
    Cardinals27
    Participant

    Free

    BA had a Cards prospects chat. Check it out if you have BA. Ortiz, Josh Baez, Franklin, Rodriguez, Doyle, and Padilla are mentioned frequently.

    #295714
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    If I recall correctly, BA has a tradition of ranking a speculative prospect just for the heck of it. I guess it’s a way of stirring things up.

    I completely agree that Padilla has next to nothing to support his high ranking other than BA’s comment ‘after discussions with plenty of scouts’. It’s almost seems like a practical joke.

    Tanner Franklin does have some credentials including a 70 grade FB and a hard cutter according to MLB. He was one of our 2nd round draft picks. His biggest problem was his control. There is potential with Franklin. Whether, or not, he realizes his potential is to be determined.

    #295715
    PugsleyAddams
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Bobby Reed can be very very persuasive. I had Leonel Alejandro Sequera at #28, but have now promoted him to the coveted #23 slot. I’m poised to anoint “Gasy” Gastelum and “Pistol” Pete Hansen as my next 2 picks, but want to do a bit more research before calling it a wrap.

    #295716
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    His biggest problem was his control.

    His biggest problems are:
    1) He only has two pitches
    2) He couldn’t crack the rotation at Kennesaw State or Tennessee
    3) His results are middling, at best

    #295725
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Each talent evaluator is looking at different things. And the role of a prospect evaluator isn’t to rank a player based off what they have done, but what they will do in the future at the big league level. High school, college, and minors stats are irrelevant at the end of the day.

    Brandon Woodruff is a guy who immediately comes to mind for a horrible college performer but has been a very productive big leaguer.

    In his draft year at Mississippi State, he only started 6 games and mostly was a RP. He threw 37.1 innings with a horrible 6.79 ERA and horrible peripherals of 29 Ks to 25 BBs. Yet in the bigs he has a career 3.10 ERA with a 29.2 K% to 6.4 BB% and has accumulated 20.5 rWAR.

    Do I personally have Franklin that high? No I have him 18 but I respect the difference in opinion and one coming from a much more knowledgeable source than me. They are looking at Franklin’s upside and see the potential for a very good SP despite risks.

    #295726
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    There is also a lot of confirmation bias in their rankings.

    A player with a 6th round grade going into the draft gets drafted in the second round, all of a sudden, all the ranking sites have him ranked much higher.

    #298837
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    The Top 10 is the same as in November, with Clarke inserted.

    #298840
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    So its a link to their sales pitch.

Viewing 25 posts - 251 through 275 (of 351 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years