The Cardinal Nation’s 2025 Top 50 Prospect Countdown

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum The Cardinal Nation’s 2025 Top 50 Prospect Countdown

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 174 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #271899
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    The study I was reading was fairly dated so no. I’m sure there is variance now in types of surgery and the way those surgeries are performed.

    I think Bling’s points that shoulder surgery is bad and that recovery times are long in general (if they ever recover) are valid. He went a little overboard by saying it never works. But he has been known to use hyperbole before.

    #271901
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    He went a little overboard by saying it never works.

    I didn’t say it never works. I said they are never better after shoulder surgery that they were before.

    The landscape with elbow surgery is different. That doesn’t always work either but it usually does. It has been said that, at least in some cases, the elbow ends up better than new and the pitcher can actually be better post TJ and before. At the least, having had the surgery doesn’t have to hamper further development. This is absolutely not the case with shoulder surgery.

    #271905
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Does the type of shoulder surgery matter? Also, do the studies differentiate between arthroscopic surgery and going under the knife? The latter is clearly more significant.

    It seems intuitive that more invasive procedures would tend to have worse immediate outcomes, but that is beside the point. The issue is that whatever the injury, and however it is fixed, it was caused by the structure being subjected to stress that it could not tolerate. In the case of an elbow, a TJ can make the elbow able to tolerate stress that is could not tolerate before, so the pitcher, once recovered, can pick up where he left off. There is no procedure to accomplish that as to a shoulder as far as I have been able to find out. So whether the damage is fixed by arthroscopic or otherwise, if the pitcher resumes doing what he was, the damage will occur again, and it is cumulative. This is why, as I have explained, the pitcher must discover some mechanics that the shoulder will be able to tolerate and try to be effective with that. If he tries to be the same pitcher he was, he just reinjures it and goes down again.

    This same argument applies even if the injury is treated by just resting until the inflammation goes down. It is what I tried to argue last year as to Roby. If he came back trying to be the pitcher he was, he would reinjure the shoulder and be out again, the same as before except now with cumulative damage. If he tried coming back pitching a different way, then there is the double risk of not being effective or of his shoulder not tolerating the new mechanics any better than the old. Whatever the case, he is not going to be the same as he was, he might be equivalent, but the odds are heavily against that. Understanding all that, it becomes clear that it does not make sense to keep him up on the top prospect list, since that guy is not the guy who will be coming back.

    This line of reasoning applies to all of the bum shoulder guys, of which we have a ton clogging up the upper part of the prospect list.

    #271938
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #271979
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #271980
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    He probably looks awful skinny at 6’7 and 188 lbs.

    Could someone dig up a photo of Wainwright in low A for comparison?

    #271982
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    An odds on favorite for this season’s NL CYA is listed at 6-6 180 lbs.

    #271983
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    (I think this discussion jumped onto the wrong thread.)

    #272001
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I was wondering what happened to my comment.

    #272064
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272123
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272163
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272200
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272201
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Brian, I am wondering how you and Blake will handle the Kloffenstein non tender since you already have the bottom part of your list set. For me and the community, we are starting at the top, so we each just slide the bottom part up and add a new #50, but that doesn’t work for you. Do you stick a guy who was not in your top 50 into your list now, in the 30s?

    #272203
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Good question. The answer is “it depends”. We’ve had to deal with this in the past and stay flexible. Either we leave his spot blank or adjust the list if/when they make a trade or add a Rule 5 guy who is prospect worthy.

    We won’t put #51 is as #50 and move everyone up a spot. Too much changing and potential confusion. And it doesn’t make sense to put #51 in as #38, for example.

    Once or twice, because of late changes (trades, Rule 5, etc.), we ended up with 51 prospects, with an extra player, number 24a, for example, inserted into the list. We did that with Rule 5 addition Ryan Fernandez last year. That is my guess on how we handle 2025. At this point, the Cards have two open roster spots heading into Rule 5, but we shall see what happens there in a couple of weeks.

    #272206
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Mo should have checked in before doing anything rash. A TCN membership would be way cheaper than hiring extra FO wonks.

    #272249
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272359
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272360
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272439
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272499
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #272502
    PugsleyAddams
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    OBP of just under .500 is eyebrow raising for any league. Can’t wait to see young Rainiel aka Rain Man, take his hacks at Palm Beach one day in the not too distant future.

    #272504
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Lots of DSL teenagers here in this part of the list. I get it though. We’ll see what happens. Hopefully not the same thing that always happens.

    #272533
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Yes, the big three from the 2024 DSL have been in the most recent six in the countdown. Still none of them are in the top 30 – yet.

    #272540
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 174 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years