January 26, 2020 at 5:18 pm #120685BlackHillsCardParticipantFree
I wouldn’t be opposed for Simmon’s #23 to be retired but I wouldn’t be upset if they didn’t considering he played 30 years ago and numerous Cardinals have worn that number including Rangers killer David Freese. The fact the Cardinals have let so many other players were the number makes it tricky to me. Its not like with Pujols whose number is essentially retired as no other player has ever worn his #5.January 26, 2020 at 5:26 pm #120687Brian WaltonKeymasterPaid - Annual
23 should not be retired, in my view. Too many retired numbers as it is. It should be reserved for only the very best of the best. If there is a doubt, the answer should be “no”. As a point of reference, 50 individuals in Cooperstown have Cardinals ties.January 26, 2020 at 5:34 pm #120688GameCardParticipantPaid - Monthly
Jerseys should be retired not #’s. I would make an exception for Stan Musial.January 26, 2020 at 8:20 pm #120691Euro DandyParticipantFree
bikemike, I loved the Carson-Uecker interviews — called him “Mr Baseball” — here are a couple good ones I remember, something like “I helped the Cardinals win the pennant. I got hepatitis……after the trainer injected me with the virus.”
Another was something like “I signed with the Braves for just a few thousand dollars. Yes, it was a little insulting. Seriously, I didn’t have that kind of dough to cough up.”January 26, 2020 at 9:14 pm #120692BlackHillsCardParticipantFree
Bob Uecker was so darn hilarious as Harry Doyle in Major League. There’s a ton of quotes from that movie alone that still crack me up.January 27, 2020 at 8:00 pm #120772bicyclemikeModeratorPaid - Annual
Great lines Euro! There was another Carson show where Uecker was talking about how he was originally a pitcher, and was warming up for a scout. He went on about how he was feeling good and throwing well and felt he was really impressing this scout. Then the scout said “Ok, let me see your fastball”.
That was the end of his pitching days.
Yeah, I am not real big on the automatic retired number for a guy that gets elected to the Hall. I would not have retired Whitey’s number for example, nor LaRussa’s. I think Tony’s was retired before he was elected.
My guess is Ted will be an exception, and not retired. Sort of similar to Joe Medwick. Although I don’t know why Medwick’s number was not retired when Enos Slaughter’s was. Seems like with those guys where they played well before this retired number thing came around, neither should have been retired. But if you are going to do it, then do both.
Like I said, the Cardinals process is awkward.February 4, 2020 at 10:38 am #121392
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.