2026 TCNs Top 50 Prospect Countdown

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum 2026 TCNs Top 50 Prospect Countdown

Viewing 25 posts - 176 through 200 (of 234 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #298390
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    In other words: lots of guys look good in the Texas League. 🙂

    #298393
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    A 2025, AA Josh Baez is exactly what the Cardinals need. Keeping my fingers crossed.

    It does make sense not to add Baez to the 40 man roster now so he can keep getting better during the projected 2027 work stoppage. Same goes for any other player on the cusp of MLB.

    #298395
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Baez already had to be added to the 40-man roster or he could have been lost in this December’s Rule 5 draft. Same with Mautz, Bernal and the others. Next year, it will be Mathews, Lin and others.

    The only way to remove Baez now would be to put him on waivers, and I give it 100% odds he would be taken. Unlike Rule 5, waiver claims do not have to stay in MLB.

    So, these young players will be stuck if there is a long work stoppage next spring. No way to avoid it other than settle quickly on a new CBA.

    I guarantee that inconveniencing some minor leaguers won’t be on either side’s top priority li$t in the negotiations.

    #298400
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I have Baez up at #5, but I understand Brian’s hesitations. BA is very high on Baez and he was their most improved player in the minors this year and will be a top 100 guy from their comments. The Cardinals are also the most improved farm system in their view as well.

    https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/who-was-2025s-most-improved-mlb-prospect-prospect-podcast/

    On the opposing side, Fangraphs (particularly Eric Longenhagen) is much more down on Baez. Copying Eric’s comments below from the September 19th chat he had.

    From Fangraph – https://blogs.fangraphs.com/eric-longenhagen-prospects-chat-9-19-25/

    12:34
    Bret S: As a Cardinal fan how excited should I be for the season Joshua Baez had?

    12:35
    Eric A Longenhagen: you can be glad he’s had a good season but I’m still skeptical about him hitting big league pitching for a sustained period of time.

    12:35
    Eric A Longenhagen: I’m surprised his K% is as low as it is, guys whose hands fire from a dead stop like his do tend to K a ton.

    It sounds like FG will most likely still have him as a 40+ guy on their rankings, but we will see when that is as I imagine if it is after Spring Training starts that ranking may change based off new info.

    #298403
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I guess Eric A Longenhagen is basing his commentary on Baez’ history, not on the possibility that a player really can bust out at any time. He should read Kyle’s assessment and read a more reserved assessment by Brian before running his mouth. Still keeping my fingers crossed and it’s not hurting my fingers a bit.

    #298410
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Mud, Eric did evaluate Baez based off this most recent year and I think he may have had in person looks as well as he travels to the team affiliates to get in person scouting time. It isn’t that he thinks Baez is a non prospect like he had before the year, but he just has some risk concerns on the hit tool as hitting in AA doesn’t mean you will hit in the majors. Baez was a 40+ on the midseason update as the Cards list as the number 17 prospect.

    I’m not a mechanics guy and aware of other players that have had hand movements like his as there are likely some success and plenty of failures (just nature of any prospect more will fail than succeed). I personally am higher on Baez than Eric is, but Eric is much more of an expert and I appreciate he has different opinions than the other evaluators. Kyle often has very different takes and that is part of why I like him as well here at TCN. I tend to like it when people have varying opinions as if you take them and average them together you get a more realistic outcome than if everyone just agrees to agree.

    #298426
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #298451
    14NyquisT
    Participant

    Keith, It’s good to know that you are so optimistic about our pitching prospects. You have six of them ahead of Crooks….. Brian only two. The Jimmy Crooks fan club will be asking for your membership card back. :).

    #298484
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #298491
    CardsFanInChiTown
    Participant

    Free

    Looking at the Gray and Contreras trades after a few knee jerk reactions, I’m giving Bloom a very solid A.

    In 12 months I’d bet two wooden nickel’s that Fajardo is ranked ahead of Clarke. I’m not at all down on Clarke, but at 18 and he’s already pitched great in A ball, that’s exciting. If they were in the draft tomorrow, Fajardo would easily be a 1st rounder and Clarke a top 50 pick.

    Well played Mr. Bloom, now get Donnie+ done for Emil Morales and River Ryan and I’ll stop wishing for Dombrowski.

    #298528
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #298529
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    I dunno about Dombrowski. Part of the Bloom saga is that he inherited a totally depleted farm system because Dombowski went all in with trades, but did win the World Series. Not unlike Walt Jocketty with St. Louis, Dave was fired 11 months after Boston took the title because they knew he wasn’t the right man for the long haul.

    As I see it, it gets down to whether you want sustained goodness or a short term shot at being even better.

    #298531
    Cardinals27
    Participant

    Free

    I have high expectations for Clarke. It all comes down to how many workable pitches he has. He has a high octane fastball and a wipeout slider. He’ll need a third pus pitch if he wants to stay as a starter.

    #298552
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Clarke is the epitome of a hype bubble. Its ridiculous.

    #298562
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but don’t offer any support of it. Many others do not see it as you do. Clarke was equally ranked in the Boston system, one that was considered deeper than the Cardinals.

    Could he fizzle out? Sure. So could any pitcher. So, if you just predict they will all fail, you would be right more than wrong, which is what your approach feels like at times. But they are not all the same. In this case, the upside is there.

    #298563
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #298597
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Whether the 7.1 bb/9 was due to control issues or due to more advanced hitters in AAA not chasing, he is not going anywhere until he comes over the plate more (without getting lit up).

    #298626
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #298630
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I’d bite if he was from San Pedro.

    #298631
    Cardinals27
    Participant

    Free

    Rodriguez is part of a potentially good crop of International signings. Best in years. I hope the next DSL batch coming stateside aren’t another Malcolm Nunez. Rodriguez sure looks a very good young hitter. Can he stay behind the plate?

    #298633
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Kyle seems higher than BA and MLB prospect pipeline on Rainiel’s chances to stick a C. Fangraphs also is high on his defense with a 40 current 60 future grade. Although Fangraphs and Kyle vary in the eval of where Rainiel is good at defense. Kyle thinks his blocking is the weakest part of his game, while Fangraphs has this to say.

    Fangraphs 2025 Updated Report on Rainiel

    Rodriguez’s best defensive trait right now is his agile ball-blocking, which he makes look easy. In the event he gives up a long rebound, he’s quick out of his crouch to prevent an advance, and this extends to his throwing. Rodriguez’s throwing footwork needs polish, but he has an average raw arm that should play up because of his exchange and accuracy.

    Catcher defense in the low minors is hard to project, but very interesting that Kyle and FG evaluate the blocking tool quite differently.

    #298640
    14NyquisT
    Participant

    Does he still have time to add a couple of inches to his 5’8″ 210lbs frame? Probably not, right?

    #298672
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I doubt Rainiel grows anymore.

    I went and checked and BA and Kyle both seem to think Rainiel’s blocking needs to be improved. Eric at FG did take a video of Rainiel from earlier this year and he does block some pitches in the dirt in it. I don’t know if Eric got a look at Rainiel on good days or if the in person looks he could just see more.

    #298684
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    I would also consider the depth of the scouting resources. For example, if an entity has one or two guys covering every level of 30 different organizations, no matter how good they are, they are going to be stretched thinner. So, their reporting may be different from larger groups that can benefit from higher levels of coverage which lead to more and varied opinions.

    (I am not throwing stones at anyone. I highly respect those who can pull off national reporting. I can barely cover one organization myself and I am full time at it. But I have a scout friend who has an encyclopedic memory and he can talk about just about any name thrown out if he has seen them at least once. I find it amazing.)

    #298685
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

Viewing 25 posts - 176 through 200 (of 234 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years