2023 Lineup

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #208469
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    All the trade chips is Mo’s dry powder. We could see something substantial happen still. A blockbuster even. Who knows. But we have more youngsters than we can find playing time for or even fit on the active roster. Maybe instead of shopping them around, Mo’s tactic is to see who comes asking as the winter wears on. Now that the catcher is done, there isn’t anything we can’t get by without, so its a strong position.

    #208532
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    So, in reading Goold’s article last night, it appears the Cardinals see Contreras as the #5 hitter, protecting Arenado.

    #208533
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    There would be an advantage to not having the three righties stacked up.

    #208537
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    There would be an advantage to not having the three righties stacked up.

    Two of those righties are Arenado & Goldschmidt. Do we really care which hand they bat with?

    #208540
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    I love pretending like I’m an all-time great field manager and filling out these line-up cards! I genuinely think if I were really doing it, my favorite team would be a long running Big League dynasty. I may even change my screen name to, “The Ol’ Perfessor”…Haha! Ay any rate, Johnny can feel free to give me a call anytime if he thinks he can use my unrivaled expertise.

    #208570
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Without reading anything, I assumed Contreras would hit fifth. The guy has consistent 20-25 HR power.

    Interestingly, with the Cubs, he batted second most often in 2022. Not that OBP is his primary skill, but had he been on the 2022 Cards, his .349 OBP would have been fourth on the team to Goldy, Arenado and Donovan.

    The L-R-L-R thing is nice if all other factors between the choices are equal, which they are not.

    Bottom line, I sure wouldn’t want to waste Contreras hitting him seventh.

    #208575
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    His OBP is why I thought he might hit 2nd, but our lineup was a lot more fun last year with Nootbaar, Donavan hitting 1-2

    #208580
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    The guy has consistent 20-25 HR power.

    Contreras hit a homer every 22 PAs last year. Coincidently, both Yepez and Gorman also hit a homer every 22 PAs. Nootbaar, the slacker, only hit one every 24 PAs.

    #208581
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Small sample size alert. Comparing three rookies who were moved all over the lineup and in and out of the lineup to an established seven-year veteran is apples and oranges. Maybe the young players were earn the right to hit behind Arenado one day, but Mo was very clear he wanted another bat from the outside to protect the big two. Contreras is it. At least for now. It could be Walker down the road. Or maybe O’Neill will return to his 2021 form.

    #208583
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    The point I was making is there is nothing remarkable about hitting a homer every 22 PAs. But I would agree there are 87 Million other reasons why he will hit 5th.

    #208585
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    Yeah, Bling. That’s the primary reason he’ll slot at #5 in the order, at least to start the season. My view is that he should be placed at #6, or even possibly #7, but my wallet isn’t the one that’s $87 MM lighter.

    #208590
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Hitting homers at the same pace as a bunch of rookies is not a justification for super gluing him in the 5 slot. The contract as a reason makes sense at least.

    My earlier point was that, given the rule about minimum batters faced by a pitcher coming in, stacking the big righties all in a row just makes things easier for the opposition later in the game.

    #208591
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    If you call facing Goldschmidt, Arenado & Contreras “easy”

    #208594
    Bob Reed
    Participant

    Free

    Versus RHP

    Donovan
    Noot
    Goldy
    Arenado
    Yepez
    O’Neill
    Contreras
    Carlson
    Edman

    Versus LHP

    Edman
    Carlson
    Goldy
    Arenado
    Contreras
    Yepez
    O’Neill
    Noot
    Donovan

    Against righties, any of the 5,6,7 hitters could be interchanged. Yepez and O’Neill have higher career slugging percentages against righties that Willson (.460 and .468 v .444), but the differences are negligible.
    Against lefties, Carlson and Nootbaar could certainly be swapped, if Noot keeps hitting southpaws like last year (.273/.400/.455 with a terrific 13/13 BB/K).

    The idea of “protecting” Goldy/Arenado has been wildly overblown, I think. The team has a slew of very good hitters who are projected — at least by the Steamer model — as well above average #5 type bats, relative to the MLB norm of 102 OPS+ for the past three seasons. To wit:

    Yepez 122 forecast
    O’Neill 118
    Contreras 118
    Burleson 118
    Carlson 115
    Gorman 110 (Yeah, he’s nowhere in my lineups. There’s no room. For him or Burley.)

    And Nootbaar and Donovan are 126 and 121, respectively, if they don’t hit at the top.
    There’s no *great* third bat, no Pujolsian titan. But the depth of quality is exceptional. Heck, even Tommy Edman could hit 5th versus lefties if you wanted, as his career slugging % of .501 against them is just dandy.

    Once we adjust for the home park, it should be a lineup that rates top 5 in MLB most days.

    #208597
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    Bob Reed…That’s a real good approach for the the entire regular season, but I’m sure you’re aware that as soon as the ’23 post-season gets underway you have to slot Arenado at #2 and Donovan at #5. Anything different invites disaster.

    #208631
    Christopher Jeske
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    For me it’s more interesting to think of a sort of playing time chart. Oli seems pretty adept at playing matchups, not just straight platoons, whether they are based on stats or maintaining health with occasional rest.

    This is all barring any future trades or injuries:

    I could see 4 “everyday” outfielders, with each of O’Neill, Nootbaar, Carlson, and Burleson getting every ~fourth game off, or phrased another way, being a late-game matchup option every ~fourth game. (~500 PA each)

    Edman gets about 10 days off (~600 PA). DeJong plays those 10 games and is a rarely used bench bat/defensive replacement at 2B.

    Goldschmidt and Arenado get about 10 days off each with occasional DH days (~630 PA each). Their off days go to the guys in the rotation below.

    2B and DH, along with the 20 CI games Goldschmidt and Arenado get off, are a semi-balanced rotation between Donovan, Gorman, and Yepez. (~480 PA each, likely not evenly distributed). DeJong maybe gets a handful of PA’s here too.

    Plan to ride Contreras hard at C (~450 PA) with Knizner getting a healthy dose of PA’s.

    Divvying up the playing time this way means there would be several different “regular” lineups, not just one. Only having one lineup with this type of a roster makes it seem like anyone not included is excess/wasted, but that’s clearly not the case.

    This also goes to show that it only takes one OF injury to open significant playing time for Walker. Likewise one non-Edman IF/DH injury opens up more PA’s at DH for Contreras and any/all of Donovan, Gorman, Yepez, and the OF’s.

    I’m all for trading for a rotation upgrade, if one is available, but the depth on the position player side can get diminished pretty quickly with any injuries if we trade more than one of these guys. Aiming for this kind of a distribution can also theoretically help maximize everyone’s trade value if eventually they do need to trade from this depth. Each player’s value as a proven major leaguer will be greater than it would be as a good prospect who has yet-to-prove themselves in the majors (where Gorman, Burleson, and Yepez find themselves now). They might need these kinds of players with established value to trade for SP at the deadline or next off-season.

    #208657
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I think there is a good chance one or more of those pieces will be gone by opening day.

    #208658
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Dreams can come true. DeJong’s brief spurt proved that a resurgence is plausible. The new hitting coach and the contract year are ingredients to stir in.

    #208659
    bccran
    Participant

    People seem to think that the opening day roster is the one the Cards will go into October with. Simply may not be so.

    #208677
    14NyquisT
    Participant

    ’22 Contreras …. = 47 XBH/45 BB

    ’22 Molina/Knizner = 27 XBH/30 BB in 9% combined more ABs

    #208706
    Cardinal in France
    Participant

    Free

    I’m not in favor of excessively fiddling with the lineup, mixing and matching, overworrying about lefty/righty placement. I say pick your best players and play them every day. Pinch hit when you need to, sit a slumping player for a while if you think it’ll help or if somebody comes down with a case of the green apple quick-step, and be judicious about giving out days off. Don’t constantly overthink and overmanage.

    #208712
    Bob Reed
    Participant

    Free

    Stole the words right out of my mouth, CIF. All commonsense insights.

    The best guys should play much more than those a notch below. There’s no way I want Burleson, for example, getting remotely as many games in the outfield as O’Neill, Noot, or Carlson. (And Yepez should never wear any glove, ever.) Burley’s defense doesn’t justify it, plus he should never be in the lineup versus lefties.

    And I want to retract my lineup card that had Donovan 9th against southpaws. I double-checked and he hit ’em fine last year in the majors, and also did so in the minors. So despite his careless baserunning, he should top the order 145-150 times while mostly playing the keystone.

    A mix-and-match collection of roster redundancies, where only three guys start 145-150 games and everyone else tops out at 110-115 or so is a terrible idea, in my opinion. Terrible for developing the young and talented hitters already on the MLB roster — of which the Cards have plenty — and also completely unacceptable for either Walker or Winn when they get the call-up.

    One of the oldest and truest axioms of player development is that highly talented position players should NOT get called up to the majors until there’s an opening for them to play every day, not four days a week. It’s been said a million times, and there’s a reason for that.

    This team still needs to make a trade, and probably one involving two from among Gorman, Burleson, and Yepez. None of those three should be getting a mere 200-250 at-bats, and the way the roster stands now, there’s every chance that more than one of them will. Or worse, they’ll get their 450-500 AB’s while taking a meaningful number of AB’s away from better defenders who hit just as well as they do, if not better.

    #208713
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I’m OK with Burly and Yepez lefty-righty DH/bat off the bench guys. Somebody has to do it. It is harder to see a good role for Gorman and DeJong that doesn’t involve sitting guys that would be highly stupid to sit.

    #208884
    Ratsbuddy
    Participant

    Free

    Some absolute complete tee-total idiot had this listed as the lineup for 2023. I believe I saw it on Facebook from Cardinal Nation.

    Edman 2B
    Contreras C
    Goldschmidt 1B
    Arenado 3B
    Donovan 2B
    O’Neill LF
    Nootbaar RF
    Yepez DH
    Carlson CF

    r/Esteemed Rat

    #208887
    1toughdominican
    Participant

    Free

    That was Marmol…

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 127 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years