St. Louis 2026 Game #105 thread – Sunday, July 26 vs. Cincinnati Reds

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum St. Louis 2026 Game #105 thread – Sunday, July 26 vs. Cincinnati Reds

Viewing 11 posts - 26 through 36 (of 36 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #314174
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    Putting Svanson in the game was giving the game away almost intentionally.

    Marmol intentionally gives away about a game a week with his lineup half-full of bench players on “get away” games.

    His bullpen usage the past two weeks does seem to indicate he is taking orders to throw away winnable games.

    #314175
    ZTR
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I mean, maybe there was simply no one else he could use today in that spot other than Svanson.

    I just dont understand why Svanson is in StL.

    #314181
    LACardFan
    Participant

    Free

    I just dont understand why Svanson is in StL.

    I think he is out of options, and he performed well last year. So, they are trying to recapture the magic without losing him to a wire claim from a team that can “fix” him.

    I would have released Stanek in June.

    #314183
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    They have only 7 pitchers in their pen because they chose to carry 6 starters. Graceffo threw 2 innings yesterday so he wasn’t available and apparently O’Brien was sick. That left 5. Gastellum, Stanek, and Soriano had already been used. The choice was either extend Soriano to a second inning (probably the better choice) or use the fresh Svanson. More right handers were coming up so Bruihl wasn’t a good choice. Svanson does have strikeout ability which is good in a runner on second situation but he also has been very hittable this season.

    Marmol hasn’t had the bullpen pieces to rely on this season like he had the past two. It’s hard to try to manage what he does have effectively, especially when you have to think about who will be available tomorrow.

    #314184
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Svanson is not out of options, but the choices to replace him are few.

    #314186
    1982 willie
    Participant

    Believe me this team isnt good enough to throw away winnable games. If someone else came in and gave up the runs, what would be the excuse then. I dontvl see anyone to blame in this game but if you was going to dole any out, it would be on the offense but maybe thats just me being realistic.

    #314187
    mudville
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    So who still wants to trade O’Brien? He’s not always fun to watch. But he has stats that say we don’t want to give him away. Maybe Gastelum replaces him one day, but not yet.

    #314188
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Days of rest going in to today was

    O’Brien 4
    Svanson 3
    Bruihl 3
    Gastelum 2
    Soriano 2
    Stanek 2
    Graceffo 1

    #314189
    PugsleyAddams
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I don’t enjoy calling for people’s jobs to be eliminated, but Svanson needs to be sent packing up the Svanny River pronto. Do not…….and I repeat do not give up on Luis Enrique Gastelum yet. He’s just starting to get settled in……we’re all going to be very pleased with what Gassy brings to the table. And I love “The Ferminator” reference earlier in this thread by……I think by the esteemed LACardFan.

    #314197
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Getting rooked on trading away Paul DeJong seems like it should be impossible.

    #314200
    1982 willie
    Participant

    Im all for trading obrien if it gives us something better in return long term. Obrien has good stuff and if this team was in championship mode id keep him but we arent.

Viewing 11 posts - 26 through 36 (of 36 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years