Michael Brantley free agent thread

Home The Cardinal Nation Forums Open Forum Michael Brantley free agent thread

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #74769
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    #74770
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I view Brantley as kind of a high risk/high reward player, similar to Donaldson. If they are healthy they can put up big numbers for you but there is always the risk of an extended stay on the DL.

    The interesting part of this is that to show interest in a RF means they must be entertaining the idea of trying to move Fowler. I can’t imagine they are going to pay him $16.5M next season to pinch hit.

    #74780
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Goold offers his take.

    #74781
    Cardinals2016
    Participant

    Free

    I’m all for this if it means we are getting rid of Fowler.

    Trade Fowler as part of a Greinke package, or trade him for Carlos Santana.

    Then sign Brantley for RF.

    Though, I think I would rather see the Cardinals trade Adolis Garcia to Tampa for Joe McCarthy.

    #74788
    thejager
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Not landing Harper i think leads straight to a Donaldson (branded as the MOTB) and Brantley (lefty RFer) set of signings…

    which i am not a fan of

    also..why would Cleveland trade Santan for Fowler? The contract is longer, but at least he is producing, Fowler offers little production hope back for anyone

    I think i could see a Santana to DBacks for Greinke type of deal happening if they move Goldy to someone else like Houston or us maybe…Phils need solid pitching to compete right now and swapping Santana’s production and contract for Greinke might be a swap the DBacks are willing to take

    I dunno..

    Brantley feels like the Leake and Fowler signings…except LEake and Fowler never were hurt like Brantley was…

    if we can get Donaldson and Brantley on 2yr deals… Maybe…but both will want a lot of money for probably longer and will probably find someone to pay it

    id rather trade assets to get a bat we swing and miss on Harper (even if it is a lot of good assets)…then use the money to sign Kikuchi and some weapons for the bullpen

    #74790
    Cardinals2016
    Participant

    Free

    why would Cleveland trade Santan for Fowler?

    Cleveland wouldn’t. He plays for the Phillies. The Phillies are trying to move Carlos Santana so they can move Rhys Hoskins back to 1B (because he was a nightmare in LF).

    One could argue, if Fowler can play defense anywhere, it would be in the third smallest ballpark (actually, might be tied for second smallest with Wrigley).

    #74793
    Onyxgem
    Participant

    Free

    ugh no thanks he is always ALWAYS injured

    #74794
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I don’t view Carlos Santana as a big upgrade over anyone especially with his onerous contract. If we are going to force Carp back to 3B then let’s trade for an elite player at 1B (Goldschmidt).

    #74797
    Cardinals2016
    Participant

    Free

    especially with his onerous contract.

    There are two years and $41 million left. $500,000 buyout on 2021. How is that onerous relative to Fowler’s three years and $48.5 million?

    #74799
    BlackHillsCard
    Participant

    Free

    The thought of the Cardinals trading for Brantley makes me throw up in my mouth.

    #74802
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    You can save the barf. Brantley is a free agent, not a trade target.

    #74804
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Cardinals2016

    Participant
    especially with his onerous contract.

    There are two years and $41 million left. $500,000 buyout on 2021. How is that onerous relative to Fowler’s three years and $48.5 million?

    If the Phillies would do a one for one swap of Santana for Fowler I might consider it but I have no idea why the Phillies would do that. Regardless, my previous point was if we are going to move Carp to 3B, where he can be a liability, let’s do it because we have acquired an elite player for 1B (Goldschmidt), instead of an overpriced albatross (Santana).

    #74816
    forsch31
    Participant

    Free

    Why do posters think Brantley is injury prone? Here is the number of PAs for Brantley for the last 6 years:

    2012 – 609
    2013 – 611
    2014 – 676
    2015 – 596
    2016 – 43
    2017 – 375
    2018 – 631

    He had shoulder surgery that effectively wiped out his 2016 and a severe ankle injury in 2017. Other than that, he has played almost every game.

    #74822
    Cardinals2016
    Participant

    Free

    let’s do it because we have acquired an elite player for 1B (Goldschmidt), instead of an overpriced albatross (Santana).

    I would rather have Goldschmidt than Santana, yes.

    I believe the only way we trade for Goldschmidt is as part of a Greinke deal, and I don’t think the front office and ownership have that vision or fortitude, based on what I have seen of them the last three years.

    Thus, I am looking for other bad contracts that we can trade Fowler for…

    I don’t think a two year/$41 million contract is an albatross in the place of a 3 year/$48.5 million contract. It is lower overall value and gets a bad player off the team sooner, freeing up roster space to protect prospects, if nothing else.

    I look at it this way, getting rid of Fowler is the single biggest improvement the Cardinals can make this offseason. They have 2 ways of doing that:
    1. Release him and eat $48.5 million. Nobody believes they will act like the Red Sox or Dodgers and swallow their pride.
    2. Trade him for a much bigger contract or one that is a different area of need.

    #74866
    BlackHillsCard
    Participant

    Free

    Do the people in the trade Fowler camp truly think he will waive his no trade clause?

    #74870
    Cardinals2016
    Participant

    Free

    Do the people in the trade Fowler camp truly think he will waive his no trade clause?

    To Arizona, yes.

    To Philadelphia or New York, no.

    Why?
    1. The media in each of the respective markets. If Fowler is miserable in St. Louis, imagine Philadelphia or New York
    2. No state income taxes in Arizona
    3. Arizona is closer to his home in Vegas
    4. He gets to have spring training near his buddies on the Cubs

    #74896
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Why would the Phillies trade Santana for Fowler? How does that improve their situation?

    #74907
    Cardinals2016
    Participant

    Free

    Why would the Phillies trade Santana for Fowler? How does that improve their situation?

    The reason they are trying to trade Santana is to move Rhys Hoskins back to 1B.

    They would have to be betting on Fowler playing left field better than Hoskins does. Both Wrigley Field and where the Phillies play are about the same size, as the second and third smallest ballparks, respectively. If Fowler can play defense anywhere, it would be in a small ballpark.

    #74914
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I know they want Hoskins at 1B but there are probably at least a dozen better trade options out there than Fowler.

    #74915
    Cardinals2016
    Participant

    Free

    Last I checked, there isn’t much of a market for $20 million first basemen these days.

    I mean, CJ Cron got released because he was projected to make $5 million this year. Of course, that was by one of the teams that receives $40+ million in revenue sharing per year even though they are in a larger metropolitan area and larger TV market than STL.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years