Home › The Cardinal Nation Forums › Open Forum › Kyle Leahy
- This topic has 177 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 2 months ago by
mudville.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 25, 2025 at 5:43 am #275330
The biggest thing that will happen this season is Bloom will formulate his plan for what happens when its over. Who stays, who goes.
January 25, 2025 at 6:28 am #275331
jj-cf-stlParticipantI hope JoJo stays past this deadline. Likely gone by the 26′ deadline.
January 25, 2025 at 7:01 am #275334The biggest thing that will happen this season is Bloom will formulate his plan for what happens when its over. Who stays, who goes.
Maybe you should move this to the ” Who stays who goes? ” thread.
January 25, 2025 at 7:14 am #275335Every team needs the roster flexibility to have several pitchers ready to ride the Triple-A shuttle. Wouldn’t it be great if the Cards’ biggest worry was the last reliever or two on the roster?
January 25, 2025 at 8:18 am #275338bccran
ParticipantKitt was in 74 games last year with an ERA of 2.80 and WHIP of 1.132. That’s 46% of the games. Please tell me who’s going to replace that production.
January 25, 2025 at 8:56 am #275340It won’t be one person. And it doesn’t need to be. He will be replaced by an aggregate of relievers. I get that is not ideal. But the team is letting the youth play. They may still sign someone. I just think it’s unlikely they get someone of Kittredge’s caliber.
January 25, 2025 at 10:02 am #275341Even if we bring in another RP and another OF, I don’t think either Roycroft or Leahy will be the ones kicked off the 40 man. I think that honor instead belongs to offseason waiver claims Roddery Munoz who was absolutely horrendous in Miami this year or Bailey Horn. Horn would have a career year if he even got his walk rate under 10%.
I’m also not sure why you think Leahy and Roycroft were so horrible. They are not world class RP, but they are low leverage guys who very importantly still have options. Bullpen options are very valuable as you can shuttle in fresh arms. If you have a bullpen of guys, but none with options (or just 1), then your pen isn’t going to be as good as one with options that can bring in fresh arms.
Zach Thompson should also be ecstatic he got an extra option year awarded as otherwise he would be done in the org. Both him and Leahy have 1 option year left, and if neither proves to be deserving of a consistent middle RP role, neither will be in the org in 26.
January 25, 2025 at 10:13 am #275342I could see value in the team bringing in one veteran RP after hearing the player’s thoughts on Kittredge’s role. The vet RP can come in and help provide guidance for young arms and hopefully provide some valuable innings at the top half of the bullpen. If we are out of it at the deadline, then we can trade them and get a 35+ or 40 future value type prospect depending on how the RP is doing.
Available RP – https://www.fangraphs.com/roster-resource/free-agent-tracker?sign=unsigned&pos=rp
Ignore Yates as he is in the finalization stage of a deal with the Dodgers.Kenley Jansen or Carlos Estevez would be the best options, but also probably the most expensive. Next tier down we could reunite with some former players like Joe Kelly, Adam Ottavino, or John Brebbia.
January 25, 2025 at 10:22 am #275343bccran
ParticipantKittredge was paid $2,630,000 last season on a one year contract. Hope our major league and minor league scouts can unearth another Kitt type for 2025.
January 25, 2025 at 11:57 am #275345
jj-cf-stlParticipantYouth is a broad term. Can we plz use something besides age discrimination to define youth?
Farmhands and 0-3 service year players? That’s youth without an arb salary, that’s due to be traded soon.
January 25, 2025 at 12:21 pm #275346
jj-cf-stlParticipantMiddleton must have been the final straw. Bill hasn’t spent a dime since.
January 25, 2025 at 12:36 pm #275348bccran
ParticipantWhen a player stays in college for a 4th year and is paid less to sign because of it, is that age discrimination? When a player seeking a long term contract who is 32 years of age is viewed differently than a 28 year old player seeking the same thing, is that age discrimination?
January 25, 2025 at 2:53 pm #275349
jj-cf-stlParticipantI wasn’t “insulted”, was just looking for a better way to describe youth. I’ll vote for farmhands and 0-3 players.
January 25, 2025 at 3:12 pm #275350It is indeed age discrimination. Just not illegal age discrimination. You have to be 40 to be protected from illegal age discrimination.
January 25, 2025 at 4:53 pm #275353ATM said:
Zach Thompson should also be ecstatic he got an extra option year awarded as otherwise he would be done in the org.
I get why the organization would be ecstatic that they control his services for another year, but Thompson is probably less so. I might guess he is about ready to try his luck elsewhere.
Go back and check out his WWU comments. He was lamenting the fact that all the guys he came up with are either established or gone. He went on to note the next wave is coming (Mathews, McGreevy, etc.).
January 25, 2025 at 4:56 pm #275354
jj-cf-stlParticipantWell lets stay with “youth” and the players.
The current pen graduates Helsley this season, JoJo the next. It’s currently not littered with contracts that can’t be optioned down. Two seasons of developing relievers who can be auditioned, and optioned in or out is a best case during the reset.
Last offseason we rented pitching to avoid promoting. Do we need to rent again? Where’s your laundry list of hopefuls Cranny? It fits this season 😀
January 25, 2025 at 7:07 pm #275356I get why the organization would be ecstatic that they control his services for another year, but Thompson is probably less so. I might guess he is about ready to try his luck elsewhere.
Go back and check out his WWU comments. He was lamenting the fact that all the guys he came up with are either established or gone. He went on to note the next wave is coming (Mathews, McGreevy, etc.).
You probably are right as he most likely would like to have a choice of swapping orgs. Without options, I wonder if he would stick with a team or just be one of those guys that is passed around waivers multiple times a season.
January 25, 2025 at 9:45 pm #275357bccran
ParticipantI’m not a scout, JJ. And I don’t have time to look up the stats of every free agent bullpen pitcher still on the market.
January 25, 2025 at 11:44 pm #275358It’s an oversight not to include Munoz, Gomez, Santos, and Graceffo into the equation this spring. After camp the shuttle riders will be revealed.
January 26, 2025 at 11:10 am #275362I liked what I saw from Leahy for the most part in 2024. He usually came in for lower leverage situations, and kept things from getting out of hand.
Roycroft is one of those guys with an explosive fastball, which gives him a little more time to audition as he has the potential to dominate, ala Jason Motte. His problem is lack of consistency in the strike zone.
I have no issue with either guy being on the 40-man, but they will need to be successful to stay.
January 26, 2025 at 11:30 am #275363
jj-cf-stlParticipantFA list? Lol, ok.
January 26, 2025 at 12:34 pm #275366If Nado’s salary is vanquished I think Kyle Finnegan would make one heck of a setup guy for Helsley. At least until the trade deadline.
January 26, 2025 at 1:54 pm #275370Kitt was in 74 games last year with an ERA of 2.80 and WHIP of 1.132. That’s 46% of the games. Please tell me who’s going to replace that production.
Nobody this season. One of the goals for this year is to figure out who will replace that production next year.
January 26, 2025 at 2:27 pm #275371bccran
ParticipantSure, JJ, the FA list. Where else would you go for a laundry list of hopefuls?
January 27, 2025 at 7:26 am #275381
jj-cf-stlParticipantSorry for the confusion. I was referring to your previous laundry lists of milb hopefuls, each offseason, while Mo was actually buying FA relievers.
Now that the org is promoting youth, you are endorsing FA signings. That’s why your previous milb laundry lists fit now.
You rebel!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
