Kyle Leahy

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 178 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #275330
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    The biggest thing that will happen this season is Bloom will formulate his plan for what happens when its over. Who stays, who goes.

    #275331
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    I hope JoJo stays past this deadline. Likely gone by the 26′ deadline.

    #275334
    KeepComingBack
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    The biggest thing that will happen this season is Bloom will formulate his plan for what happens when its over. Who stays, who goes.

    Maybe you should move this to the ” Who stays who goes? ” thread.

    #275335
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    Every team needs the roster flexibility to have several pitchers ready to ride the Triple-A shuttle. Wouldn’t it be great if the Cards’ biggest worry was the last reliever or two on the roster?

    #275338
    bccran
    Participant

    Kitt was in 74 games last year with an ERA of 2.80 and WHIP of 1.132. That’s 46% of the games. Please tell me who’s going to replace that production.

    #275340
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    It won’t be one person. And it doesn’t need to be. He will be replaced by an aggregate of relievers. I get that is not ideal. But the team is letting the youth play. They may still sign someone. I just think it’s unlikely they get someone of Kittredge’s caliber.

    #275341
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Even if we bring in another RP and another OF, I don’t think either Roycroft or Leahy will be the ones kicked off the 40 man. I think that honor instead belongs to offseason waiver claims Roddery Munoz who was absolutely horrendous in Miami this year or Bailey Horn. Horn would have a career year if he even got his walk rate under 10%.

    I’m also not sure why you think Leahy and Roycroft were so horrible. They are not world class RP, but they are low leverage guys who very importantly still have options. Bullpen options are very valuable as you can shuttle in fresh arms. If you have a bullpen of guys, but none with options (or just 1), then your pen isn’t going to be as good as one with options that can bring in fresh arms.

    Zach Thompson should also be ecstatic he got an extra option year awarded as otherwise he would be done in the org. Both him and Leahy have 1 option year left, and if neither proves to be deserving of a consistent middle RP role, neither will be in the org in 26.

    #275342
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I could see value in the team bringing in one veteran RP after hearing the player’s thoughts on Kittredge’s role. The vet RP can come in and help provide guidance for young arms and hopefully provide some valuable innings at the top half of the bullpen. If we are out of it at the deadline, then we can trade them and get a 35+ or 40 future value type prospect depending on how the RP is doing.

    Available RP – https://www.fangraphs.com/roster-resource/free-agent-tracker?sign=unsigned&pos=rp
    Ignore Yates as he is in the finalization stage of a deal with the Dodgers.

    Kenley Jansen or Carlos Estevez would be the best options, but also probably the most expensive. Next tier down we could reunite with some former players like Joe Kelly, Adam Ottavino, or John Brebbia.

    #275343
    bccran
    Participant

    Kittredge was paid $2,630,000 last season on a one year contract. Hope our major league and minor league scouts can unearth another Kitt type for 2025.

    #275345
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    Youth is a broad term. Can we plz use something besides age discrimination to define youth?

    Farmhands and 0-3 service year players? That’s youth without an arb salary, that’s due to be traded soon.

    #275346
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    Middleton must have been the final straw. Bill hasn’t spent a dime since.

    #275348
    bccran
    Participant

    When a player stays in college for a 4th year and is paid less to sign because of it, is that age discrimination? When a player seeking a long term contract who is 32 years of age is viewed differently than a 28 year old player seeking the same thing, is that age discrimination?

    #275349
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    I wasn’t “insulted”, was just looking for a better way to describe youth. I’ll vote for farmhands and 0-3 players.

    #275350
    Jnevel
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    It is indeed age discrimination. Just not illegal age discrimination. You have to be 40 to be protected from illegal age discrimination.

    #275353
    Brian Walton
    Keymaster

    Paid - Annual

    ATM said:

    Zach Thompson should also be ecstatic he got an extra option year awarded as otherwise he would be done in the org.

    I get why the organization would be ecstatic that they control his services for another year, but Thompson is probably less so. I might guess he is about ready to try his luck elsewhere.

    Go back and check out his WWU comments. He was lamenting the fact that all the guys he came up with are either established or gone. He went on to note the next wave is coming (Mathews, McGreevy, etc.).

    #275354
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    Well lets stay with “youth” and the players.

    The current pen graduates Helsley this season, JoJo the next. It’s currently not littered with contracts that can’t be optioned down. Two seasons of developing relievers who can be auditioned, and optioned in or out is a best case during the reset.

    Last offseason we rented pitching to avoid promoting. Do we need to rent again? Where’s your laundry list of hopefuls Cranny? It fits this season 😀

    #275356
    AlbertTheMachine
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I get why the organization would be ecstatic that they control his services for another year, but Thompson is probably less so. I might guess he is about ready to try his luck elsewhere.

    Go back and check out his WWU comments. He was lamenting the fact that all the guys he came up with are either established or gone. He went on to note the next wave is coming (Mathews, McGreevy, etc.).

    You probably are right as he most likely would like to have a choice of swapping orgs. Without options, I wonder if he would stick with a team or just be one of those guys that is passed around waivers multiple times a season.

    #275357
    bccran
    Participant

    I’m not a scout, JJ. And I don’t have time to look up the stats of every free agent bullpen pitcher still on the market.

    #275358
    Nigel T
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    It’s an oversight not to include Munoz, Gomez, Santos, and Graceffo into the equation this spring. After camp the shuttle riders will be revealed.

    #275362
    bicyclemike
    Moderator

    Paid - Annual

    I liked what I saw from Leahy for the most part in 2024. He usually came in for lower leverage situations, and kept things from getting out of hand.

    Roycroft is one of those guys with an explosive fastball, which gives him a little more time to audition as he has the potential to dominate, ala Jason Motte. His problem is lack of consistency in the strike zone.

    I have no issue with either guy being on the 40-man, but they will need to be successful to stay.

    #275363
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    FA list? Lol, ok.

    #275366
    gscottar
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    If Nado’s salary is vanquished I think Kyle Finnegan would make one heck of a setup guy for Helsley. At least until the trade deadline.

    #275370
    blingboy
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Kitt was in 74 games last year with an ERA of 2.80 and WHIP of 1.132. That’s 46% of the games. Please tell me who’s going to replace that production.

    Nobody this season. One of the goals for this year is to figure out who will replace that production next year.

    #275371
    bccran
    Participant

    Sure, JJ, the FA list. Where else would you go for a laundry list of hopefuls?

    #275381
    jj-cf-stl
    Participant

    Sorry for the confusion. I was referring to your previous laundry lists of milb hopefuls, each offseason, while Mo was actually buying FA relievers.

    Now that the org is promoting youth, you are endorsing FA signings. That’s why your previous milb laundry lists fit now.

    You rebel!

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 178 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 25 years