Home › The Cardinal Nation Forums › Open Forum › “Cheap” new uniforms
- This topic has 16 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 7 months ago by
Brian Walton.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 13, 2024 at 9:53 am #242659
This is what the back of the white jerseys look like with the new template. Players are pretty unhappy. Miles Mikolas says they also don’t fit right; pants are no longer as customized, and the fabric is a very different consistency.
“They look cheap,” another player said. pic.twitter.com/UoH4vVHTfd
— Jeff Jones (@jmjones) February 13, 2024
February 13, 2024 at 10:43 am #242666I guess the dysfunction with the Bally’s Midwest revenue strikes again.
February 13, 2024 at 10:44 am #242667I think the move from Nike to Fanatics was an MLB-wide one.
February 13, 2024 at 11:20 am #242669Yeah I saw a video on Youtube the other night about how Dodger fans are up in arms because the new uniforms display their logo on the front of the jersey in a slightly different manner. The video referenced Nike as the culprit though.
February 13, 2024 at 11:39 am #242671I assume they will still have a sponsor advertisement patch.
February 13, 2024 at 3:00 pm #242683Brian and gscott said respectively:
I think the move from Nike to Fanatics was an MLB-wide one.
The video referenced Nike as the culprit though.
I think it’s a joint venture with Nike outsourcing the actual material production. It’s a great combo, though. You get the Nike swoosh — with Fanatics quality. LOL.
February 13, 2024 at 5:27 pm #242688Maybe they decided to make the uniforms look cheap so that players would be more likely to get them dirty? At any rate, teams don’t seem to have what I would term an everyday home white or road grey uniform anymore. They have entire wardrobes that contain what sometimes seem to be countless mix and match possibilities. In any event, once the Cardinals caved to the concept of an “alternate jersey” in 2013, the proverbial whiz-kids came up with the inane idea of placing “St. Louis” on the front of the jersey when the team was playing at home…Haha! I guess they thought if a fan were so stupid as to submit to being gouged for the price of admission along with a $20 hot dog and Coca Cola, that he was also probably too dumb to know what town he was in…
February 13, 2024 at 6:53 pm #2426901tough said:
In any event, once the Cardinals caved to the concept of an “alternate jersey” in 2013, the proverbial whiz-kids came up with the inane idea of placing “St. Louis” on the front of the jersey when the team was playing at home…
That was a Bill DeWitt III special. (They are likely playing to the casual fan = jersey buyer, not traditionalists.)
February 13, 2024 at 7:04 pm #242692Will have to see more of them, but I am sure they are cheaper as the quest is never ending for revenue increases and cost decreases. That is a natural evolution, whether it be our own family budget or big corporate entities, but there comes a point where intangibles are as important or moreso than dollars.
February 13, 2024 at 7:39 pm #242693Excellent observation, Bikemike. It’s been my experience that the overall presence of quality craftsmanship has taken a steep nose dive in almost all areas of consumer goods in recent years. Nearly everything is poor quality, cheap, throwaway junk, and almost nothing is even worth the effort to repair or refurbish. My theory for the reason for this is that quality craftsmen are practically nonexistent in today’s world. The human hand almost never produces anything anymore and when it does, the product isn’t affordable for the vast majority of people. Genuine man made art is rapidly disappearing.
February 14, 2024 at 6:04 am #242698I’ve got a great idea for saving money. Have just two uniforms, one white and one gray, and everything else the same.
February 20, 2024 at 11:40 pm #242898See-through pants is a new touch.
Cal’s got jokes 😆 pic.twitter.com/rhrDgl6x8h
— Seattle Mariners (@Mariners) February 21, 2024
February 21, 2024 at 7:57 am #242902lmao Fanatics' new jerseys are so trash that their customer service team is responding "oops, that looks wrong, please contact us so we can replace your screwed-up jersey order" not realizing they're replying to… a photo of an actual MLB player's actual MLB uniform pic.twitter.com/LXQSRLXdHK
— ℳatt (@matttomic) February 21, 2024
February 22, 2024 at 8:47 pm #242952It's *shocking* to see the size of the NOB. These look like youth replicas. What a debacle. @UniWatch #SpringTraining #STLCards pic.twitter.com/mWbqWxr1qz
— Chris in St. Louis (@ChrisInSTL) February 23, 2024
February 22, 2024 at 10:35 pm #242954I would share more pics of how bad the pants look but Brian might ban me for posting porn. I’m not joking…
February 23, 2024 at 5:07 am #242957The names are smaller but what about the birds on the bat? The birds were made larger a couple yers ago I think.
I also wonder if the new pants will allow for players to have both ankle length and bloused at the knee versions. Some guys wear one or the other, and some guys use both.
February 27, 2024 at 7:17 am #243141The #STLCards are wearing the home whites today for the first time in Grapefruit League play. They include the sponsored STIFEL patch. They wore gray in their first four ST games. pic.twitter.com/4UurauaICU
— John Denton (@JohnDenton555) February 27, 2024
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
