Cards64, I agree. Capping it at 55 or 60 is probably best (60 is fine as you suggested). I think we could get around 80-85 prospects named if we wanted to but after that our other players truly are just filler with not much potential to ever be in the big leagues. We could also do like Brian and Blake and just name our “Best of the Rest”. To do that, we could run the normal vote to 50 (which ends tonight) and then each of us names 15 other prospects that we like who we considered for the top 50 (or we had in the top 50). Then, you can make a master sheet of how many times those guys got named in someone’s list to come up with our final Best of the Rest in no particular order. I can help count them up if you want. So either method works but I kind of prefer this Best of the Rest method because it gets hard at this point to rank guys in order.