Home › The Cardinal Nation Forums › Open Forum › Minor League Game thread – 2026 Week 24
- This topic has 26 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 1 day, 4 hours ago by
stlcard25.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 2, 2026 at 6:44 am #317820
The #stlcards system was 3-1 on Tuesday. The Cardinal Nation’s Player of the Day, Springfield SS Jesús Báez, was 4-for-5 including his 36th home run and two RBI. Other standouts: Noah Mendlinger, Tanner Franklin, Ian Petrutz and Jayden Lobliner. https://t.co/bMPYfmQRYn pic.twitter.com/9v4JnTbXXs
— Brian Walton (@B_Walton) September 2, 2026
September 3, 2026 at 7:36 am #317934The #stlcards system was 2-2 on Wednesday. The Cardinal Nation’s Player of the Day, Peoria DH Andrew Williamson, hit two singles and a double, walked, drove in a run and scored twice. Other standouts include Caden Ferraro and Jesus Garcia. https://t.co/AmpFcRdVex pic.twitter.com/kU4QQKYlxE
— Brian Walton (@B_Walton) September 3, 2026
September 4, 2026 at 6:09 am #318063The #stlcards system was a perfect 4-0 on Thursday. TCN’s Player of the Day, Peoria’s Jacob Odle, struck out a career-high 12 across five innings of two-hit ball. Other standouts: Hansen, Doyle, Ortiz, Ragsdale, Rodriguez, Bissetta, Dos Santos and Condon. https://t.co/mlLMM8hmII pic.twitter.com/VBXQyoz1Yf
— Brian Walton (@B_Walton) September 4, 2026
September 4, 2026 at 9:44 am #318072
stlcard25ParticipantOdle has been starting, and I’m sure they’ll try to keep him there as long a possible. At the same time, I’d love to see him in the Springfield bullpen for the playoffs. The Cardinals have really been targeting the college reliever to pro starter pipeline the last few years.
September 4, 2026 at 9:47 am #318073
stlcard25ParticipantAlso, that list of standouts is one of the better ones we’ve had this year. It’s a bunch of guys who project to or we certainly hope can make a big league impact in the next three years or so. It’s fun to see Condon hit the ground running. I feel even better about that pick at the moment, although I’d be curious to hear the scouting talk from his first couple weeks in professional baseball.
September 4, 2026 at 10:20 am #318074The Cardinals have really been targeting the college reliever to pro starter pipeline the last few years.
Hmm, I am glad you pointed that out 25. I had a vague sense that the Cardinals organization, and probably some others, might be trying different strategies in response to the rampant starter attrition that has been so prevalent throughout baseball. An obvious strategy trend has been the careful curating of workload, days between starts, modest pitch counts, etc., but that seems to have had limited success. In recent years there has been increased focus on the effect of overwork of the pitching arms early on in the youth stage while the structures are developing. There seems to be emerging science to the effect the hard and heavy use early on causes certain anatomical changes that are not conducive to long term arm health. It makes sense then that the previous focus on the Friday night starter types might lead to a high rate of acquiring arms that are already damaged to begin with. Obviously, I don’t know what the thinking is, but perhaps it is to acquire some pitchers with a different type of early pitching experience.
September 5, 2026 at 7:02 am #318124The #stlcards system was 2-2 on Friday. TCN’s Player of the Day, Memphis RF Zach Levenson, hit two singles, a double, a homer, drove in five and scored three runs. Other standouts: Paige, Yerzy, McGee, Braden Davis, Holiday, Williamson and Henne. https://t.co/Sa1j7HJdUM pic.twitter.com/gxtAddbyxn
— Brian Walton (@B_Walton) September 5, 2026
September 5, 2026 at 8:45 am #318126Is Levinson. a legit prospect?
September 5, 2026 at 7:07 pm #318157He could be CC. But not right now. He has struggled a lot this season. He came on strong at the end of last season too, coincidentally.
September 6, 2026 at 8:07 am #318187Cijntje went 6 shutout innings. 4 H, 1 BB, 90 pitches. It looks like he’s been going 80-90 all year. Sometimes hittable, sometimes not. He could be in the mix next spring.
-
This reply was modified 3 days, 3 hours ago by
blingboy.
September 6, 2026 at 4:11 pm #318229Molina shooting up my prospect rankings
September 6, 2026 at 5:57 pm #318257Molina, Cijntje, Doyle, Franklin, and Hjerpe the likely Memphis starters to begin the year next season. That is a fantastic well to draw from when injuries eventually occur. That doesn’t even include Roby (who very likely moves to relief to manage innings and speed along his time) or Eagan who is deserving of a Memphis promotion now. Then there’s still Fajardo who is knocking on the door for Memphis now plus Brandt Thompson and Hansen who have both generally held up solidly at Memphis. And still after all that you have Odle and Braden Davis who may be starting in Memphis at some point next season. The depth is finally growing into measurable depth.
September 6, 2026 at 6:07 pm #318260The depth is finally growing into measurable depth.
Yes the system is moving in the right direction for sure. By next year it could start becoming a top system in real life land rather than just in wonk spreadsheet land. It does still remain to be seen what guys are going to look like when they pop up on the ML roster. So far there has been both reason for optimism and reason for concern in that regard. I am confident the best is yet to come, soon hopefully.
September 6, 2026 at 6:13 pm #318261bling said:
By next year it could start becoming a top system in real life land rather than just in wonk spreadsheet land. It does still remain to be seen what guys are going to look like when they pop up on the ML roster.
It is very true that prospects are just prospects until they are major leaguers. However, that is the case for EVERY system. All 30 are in the same boat.
So, the relevant question is, “Are the Cards better positioned than most systems?” not, “Do the Cards have a bunch of sure things?”
My point is that one must judge all systems equally. Or if not, please explain why other systems should be better ranked.
Of course, ranking the systems after the fact would be a much more exact process, but 100% hindsight isn’t the point.
September 6, 2026 at 6:36 pm #318269I get your point Brian, but try to imagine looking at it from the vantage point of someone who knows next to nothing about the other 29 systems. I have to equate top ranked with effectiveness. MLB is full of stars, of impact players, of top end starters, good relievers and they all came from somewhere. As I have said, I am hopeful and optmistic about the system, but I am not putting the cart before the horse. That somewhere I mentionaed is looking like it could soon be here rather than somewhere else. When is the last time we had two homegrown 100 RBI guys in the middle of the lineup? I like the starters coming. The results could be top ranked before too long. But that last hurdle is high and is yet to be cleared.
September 6, 2026 at 7:44 pm #318274Do t forget Eagan
September 6, 2026 at 9:54 pm #318283bling, but again, you are looking at the Cardinals in a vacuum. By your definition, NO SYSTEMS can more effective than the Cardinals because NONE of the players have reached MLB yet.
You disparage those who rank farm systems as “wonks” with “spreadsheets” as if they don’t scout players and have many industry contacts.
But since you (and I) readily admit that we don’t know the other 29 systems well enough to rank them, why cannot we accept the word of those organizations who study farm systems as their business? They believe the Cardinals are one of the better systems in MLB. We all know that may or may not translate to 100 RBI success later on, or any other measure.
You can’t seem to allow yourself to accept a future indicator that is good because by definition it hasn’t happened yet. I see that as a shame.
September 6, 2026 at 10:04 pm #318285I think you cannot see my point. Impact players have been coming from other systems more than from ours, therefore other systems are better than ours. As of this moment. A year from now, our system might be one cranking them out. Then it will be better than the others. Effectiveness is my measure, not adding up WAR of teens in A level, or whatever it is they think matters.
September 7, 2026 at 9:26 am #318312No, I can see your point. It is plain wrong. It would be like piloting a boat by following its wake. What systems did in the past is IRRELEVANT to the players of today.
It is very simple. Look at the potential of the players there NOW.
I cannot possibly disagree with you more. You have created your own way to rank farm systems that is unlike how the rest of the world does it.
-
This reply was modified 2 days, 2 hours ago by
Brian Walton.
September 7, 2026 at 9:28 am #318313The #stlcards system was 3-1 on Sunday as Class-A teams closed their seasons. TCN’s Player of the Day, Memphis LH Mason Molina, went 6 IP with 9Ks. Other standouts: Ian Petrutz, Jesús Báez, Yordalin Peña, Sebastian Dos Santos, Owen Henne & J.P. Cabrera. https://t.co/t8NC3pmPaO pic.twitter.com/l9NQdnPujp
— Brian Walton (@B_Walton) September 7, 2026
September 7, 2026 at 9:38 am #318316It is nuance perhaps, but I think system strength relates not to how good the current prospects pan out on paper, but rather to how much impact they will eventually have in MLB. So, how to see into the future and predict what impact is going to come out the end of the pipe? Your idea is to look at spreadsheets, mine is to look at results that the system has been achieving. Results identify a bad system or a good one.
September 7, 2026 at 10:17 am #318320Another prospect we don’t talk about is Crossland. Since being promoted to Peoria he a 1,42 era in 5 games. He has walked fewer batters as well.
September 7, 2026 at 10:34 am #318325Bling, how can you rate a system on past results when the entire system has been overhauled in the last 24 months?
September 7, 2026 at 10:43 am #318330Yeah agree with Forsch. The group acquiring and developing the players isn’t even the same as the prior regimes and their failures shouldn’t impact how you evaluate the current prospects.
September 7, 2026 at 4:35 pm #318350So let me get this straight. You want to look at won-loss records that are aggregates of six or seven affiliates totaling over 200 players when only 10 or 12 of them will eventually reach the majors.
That is not only ridiculous but is precisely the spreadsheet management that you ridicule.
Or do you mean MLB record? That is the aggregate of 35 or 40 players each year who range in age from 22 to 36. They were acquired in different ways over a 10 to 15 year period with wildly different payrolls across the 30 teams. Trying to connect that somehow to a farm system is a given year would be a fools errand.
And what about players developed here who were traded away? Etc. Etc.
It might be time to stop digging.
-
This reply was modified 1 day, 18 hours ago by
Brian Walton.
-
This reply was modified 3 days, 3 hours ago by
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
