- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
From all those ranking services that did not have our system ranked in the top 10 going in tô the season. (Basically all of them)
7 top 100 players.
3-4 additional rookies who might be considered for tôp 100 they had not passed the rookie threshhold during this year.
14 rookies + 1 non rookie who started in Memphis (Oviedo) have contributed this year.
9 Plus Oviedo who are currently on the roster in the middle of a pennant race.
20 rookies who have contributed tô the Major League team or are top 100 prospects.
6 current at least part time rookie starters or rotation pitchersAll of this before the all star break.
I would be willing tô bet these numbers cant be matched by any system this year
I would also bet that by rookie WAR we are at or near the top.
Again ali this from the system that hás the most top 100 prospects in baseball.
Look.me in the eye and tell me we didnt have a top 10 system going in tô the year.
I want my apology. I want tô ser meu culpas. These raters should be ascende!
Corrections tô the above
15 rookies have contributed this year
21 rookies or top 100 prospects
(Forgot Capel)8 current rookies on the roster (didn’t realize Libertore had been sent down)
We excel at providing MLB capable role players and fill in guys. The system raters probably value impact players more.
I’m sorry CC. Since you are one of my all time favorite posters, I offer a sincere apology and promise to wear my hair shirt way up high in the attic. The so called experts may balk, but I for one will acknowledge you are right and have done so for years. Sorry about the confusing REM reference, also.
Bleacher report Just issued their form of an apology. After ranking us 23rd in the off season they have moved us up tô #2 midseason (and it wasnt on the strength of draft)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.