bccran

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 3,101 through 3,125 (of 3,400 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2018 closer – who you got? #31600
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    We seem to have developed our own pretty well with
    Worrell, Wainwright, Rosenthal, etc.

    There are plenty of power arms in the system to consider.

    in reply to: Big Bat #31578
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    DeJong – turned 24 this month
    Bader – just turned 23
    O’Neill – just turned 22
    Kelly – just turned 23
    Grichuk – just turned 26
    Piscotty – 26 last January

    Youth.

    in reply to: Big Bat #31569
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Okay, leave the discussion, Brian, but you and I both know that when you get right down to it, it’s pitching and defense that win championships. Also, I look at a rookie on our roster right now who’s hitting .301 at the major league level with 20 home runs in only 286 at bats and it causes me to not shut the door on our prospects like Bader, O’Neill, Adonis Garcia, etc. and say “we don’t have any big bats in our system”. Just a personal choice.

    in reply to: Big Bat #31564
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Grichuk, Piscotty, and Diaz flops? No, I don’t think it’s quite that bad. Disappointments, sure, but they’re still developing players.

    Forsch – the comparisons of players who didn’t do much better than our present guys but matured into big bats at the MLB level must have fallen on ears unwilling to listen. And the stats I gave of Taveras his last 2 years must have hit a wall with you. Plus his weaknesses on defense, that were causing the Cardinal to entertain offers. You’re right, discontinuing the conversation is probably in your best interest.

    One last one for Brian – how many players on the recent World Champion Giants had an OPS above 1.000? How many above .900? How many above .800? The answer is zero, zero, and 2. How many on that team had more than 40 home runs? above 30 home runs? Above 20 home runs. The answer is zero, zero, and 1. How were they so successful without a big bat? Balance. Up and down the lineup.

    in reply to: 2017 MLB Game #127: Cards vs. Padres Thu Aug 24 #31558
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Maddening team to watch. No way they should have lost 2 out of 3 at home to lowly Padres.

    in reply to: Big Bat #31543
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Holliday is missed. He provided leadership in so many ways. He wasn’t a “big” bat ala Votto, Bryant, etc. Just a very solid reliable bat. And quietly set an example off the field.

    I wasn’t particularly high on DeJong, but he’s done extremely well this year. That’s one of the reasons I don’t want to prejudge
    Piscotty, Bader, O’Neill, etc.

    in reply to: Big Bat #31534
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    That’s okay, Brian. We can agree to disagree on this. I just hold our top prospects in higher regard than you do. And I don’t pretend to know in advance whether they’re going to work out or not. No problem.

    in reply to: Big Bat #31525
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Taveras had 8 home runs in 262 plate appearances at Memphis in 2014. When he was called up to the Cardinals he had 3 home runs in 248 plate appearances. That’s 11 home runs in 510 plate appearances.

    The year before that, he had 5 home runs in 188 plate appearances.

    Do you really call that mashing?

    in reply to: Big Bat #31524
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    How about going to the MLB.com list of Top 100 prospects in all the minors. I believe that represents the top 1-2% of all the minor leaguers. In 2012 Piscotty was ranked #51. In 2016 O’Neill was #60 and Bader was
    #83. At mid-season 2017 Kelly was #36, O’Neill #96, and Bader #99. What makes you so sure that they won’t become a “big bat” at the major league level. My point in bringing up others is that their numbers didn’t really reach “big bat” level until they made it to the majors and adjusted to the majors. Their numbers were pretty similar to our top prospects right now.

    in reply to: Big Bat #31519
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    OT was riding on a reputation he garnered at Peoria in 2011 and to a certain extent at Springfield in 2012. His numbers went downhill from there, if you are referring to him as a “big Bat” on the rise –

    2009 – Dom – – 272 PAs – 1HR/42RBI/.357/.338/.731
    2010 – GCL/JC – 260 PAs – 8 HRs/45RBI/.303/.342/.828
    2011 – Peoria – 347 PAs – 8 HRs/62 RBI/.386/.444/.828
    2012 – Springfield – 531 PAs – 23 HRs/94 RBI/.321/.380/.953\
    2013 – Memphis – 188 PAs – 5 HRs/32 RBI/.310/.348..819
    2014 – Memphis – 262 PAs – 8 HRs/49RBI/.318/.370/.872
    2014 – Cardinals – 248 PAs – 3HRs/22RBI/.239/.278/.590

    Plus he had some limitations on defense and on the bases. He was anything but a surefire star in the making. The jury was still out, just like it’s out on Piscotty, Grichuk, Bader, O’Neill, etc.
    You can point to age, but that still doesn’t give you any assurances.

    in reply to: 2018 closer – who you got? #31500
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    I don’t think anyone can say that we don’t have any run producers in the system. With Fowler, Pham,
    Grichuk, Piscotty, Martinez, Bader, O’Neill, A. Garcia, Arozarena, and Sierra – you don’t really know who is going to breakout like DeJong did this year. The list doesn’t have a Stanton on it, but it has plenty of talent. The only hole I really see is 3B. Gyorko is a band aid, but he would probably be more overall effective in his super utility role.

    in reply to: 2017 MLB Game #126: Cards vs. Padres Wed Aug 23 #31480
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Traditionally, the 4th and 5th infielders are a versatile middle infielder type like Garcia and a corner bruiser type with some power who can come off the bench in the late innings with some pop. The latter was supposed to be
    Gyorko. It became Voit for awhile.
    It may be Voit again in the future. You never know. That spot may be for a bat and not necessarily versatility.

    in reply to: 2018 closer – who you got? #31479
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Where would you add offense?
    3B?

    Carpenter
    Pham
    DeJong
    Fowler
    Wong
    Gyorko
    Molina
    Piscotty
    Grichuk
    Martinez
    Bader
    O’Neill
    Sierra
    Adolis Garcia

    in reply to: 2018 closer – who you got? #31477
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Do you really think the Cardinals will go outside and spend big bucks when they’ve been burned by the Duke and Cecil signings? Plus the Leake signing as a starter?
    If I were to bet, I’d put my money on a Wacha or a Brebbia.

    in reply to: 2018 closer – who you got? #31472
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Wacha may be a natural because he comes on strong and then seems to have a problem the second and third time through the lineup.
    Plus it keeps his seasonal innings down.

    I may be wrong, but I think the Cards are moving toward a rotation of Martinez, Reyes, Weaver, Flaherty, and Hudson.

    in reply to: 2017 MLB Game #126: Cards vs. Padres Wed Aug 23 #31469
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    5th infielder next year will probably be a competition between
    Garcia, Diaz, Mejia, and Valera.
    The other IF bench competition may be between Voit and Wisdom.

    in reply to: Minor league team notebooks #31468
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Springfield roster players who have a shot at making it? Here’s a stab –

    Alcantara
    Ellis
    Gomber
    Helsley
    Gallen
    Knizner
    Alvarez
    Edman
    Adolis Garcia
    Arozarena
    Sierra
    Mercado

    That’s pretty strong. Almost half the roster.

    in reply to: 2018 closer – who you got? #31463
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Wacha.

    in reply to: Minor league team notebooks #31435
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Went with where they spent most of the s season.

    Move it to the current Palm Beach roster – how about:

    Fernandez
    Hicks
    O’Reilly
    Woodford

    No position players.

    in reply to: 2017 MLB Game #126: Cards vs. Padres Wed Aug 23 #31425
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Isn’t it delightful to have an effective starter tonight?

    in reply to: Percent Who Make It By Level #31407
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Starter = gains everyday starter position.
    Bench = utility player only.

    in reply to: Percent Who Make It By Level #31406
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Many feel that Voit can be a major league starter. If not with the Cardinals, then somewhere else. The announcers have said that.

    in reply to: Percent Who Make It By Level #31360
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Would really enjoy a conversation about whom posters think will make it at each level.

    Starting with Memphis, how about

    Flaherty (rotation)
    Gant (bullpen)
    Hudson (rotation)
    Sherriff (bullpen)
    Diaz (bench)
    Mejia (bench)
    Ravello (bench)
    Voit (starter)
    Valera (bench)
    O’Neill (starter)
    Bader (starter)

    That’s 11 out of 26, or 42%.

    in reply to: Minor league team notebooks #31340
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Peoria Chiefs possible future major leaguers?

    Carlson
    Edman
    Knizner
    Robertson
    Hicks
    O’Reilly

    Anyone else?

    in reply to: 2017 MLB Game #125: Cards vs. Padres Tue Aug 22 #31339
    Avatarbccran
    Participant

    Paid - Annual

    Last year, they were in the playoff hunt until the last day of the season. Pitching was key. Predicting a bad team for next year is very silly.

Viewing 25 posts - 3,101 through 3,125 (of 3,400 total)

First-hand news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals™ and minor league system for over 20 years